Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Sep;9(3):260-3.

Evaluation of light traps for sampling anopheline mosquitoes in Kilifi, Kenya

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8245934

Evaluation of light traps for sampling anopheline mosquitoes in Kilifi, Kenya

C N Mbogo et al. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1993 Sep.

Abstract

Anopheline mosquitoes were sampled inside houses, where residents slept under untreated bednets, by CDC light traps and human-biting catches to evaluate light traps as a means for determining human exposure to malaria vectors in Kilifi District, Kenya. Mosquitoes were sampled during 2 all-night collections by light traps and one all-night biting catch in a series of 262 houses. Collections yielded 1,721 Anopheles gambiae s.l. and 46 An. funestus, and 60.3% of the houses were negative for anophelines. There was a significant correlation in numbers of An. gambiae s.l. captured by light traps and human-biting collections (r = 0.64), but light traps were biased and underestimated An. gambiae s.l. abundance. This bias increased with increasing mosquito abundance. In addition, the proportion of An. gambiae s.l. infected by Plasmodium falciparum was 2.3-fold higher in light traps than in human-biting collections. Along the coastal zone of Kenya where vector abundance is low, light traps do not provide an adequate estimate of man-vector contact when such information is required at the household level in epidemiological studies of malaria parasite transmission.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types