Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 Nov 15;90(22):10663-7.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10663.

Genetic and linguistic differentiation in the Americas

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Genetic and linguistic differentiation in the Americas

R H Ward et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The relationship between linguistic differentiation and evolutionary affinities was evaluated in three tribes of the Pacific Northwest. Two tribes (Nuu-Chah-Nulth and Bella Coola) speak Amerind languages, while the language of the third (Haida) belongs to a different linguistic phylum--Na-Dene. Construction of a molecular phylogeny gave no evidence of clustering by linguistic affiliation, suggesting a relatively recent ancestry of these linguistically divergent populations. When the evolutionary affinities of the tribes were evaluated in terms of mitochondrial sequence diversity, the Na-Dene-speaking Haida had a reduced amount of diversity compared to the two Amerind tribes and thus appear to be a biologically younger population. Further, since the sequence diversity between the two Amerind-speaking tribes is comparable to the diversity between the Amerind tribes and the Na-Dene Haida, the evolutionary divergence within the Amerind linguistic phylum may be as great as the evolutionary divergence between the Amerind and Na-Dene phyla. Hence, in the New World, rates of linguistic differentiation appear to be markedly faster than rates of biological differentiation, with little congruence between linguistic hierarchy and the pattern of evolutionary relationships.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Theor Popul Biol. 1972 Mar;3(1):87-112 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1976 Nov 25;264(5584):350-2 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1981 Apr 9;290(5806):457-65 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Aug;85(16):6002-6 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Nov;43(5):709-25 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources