Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Dec;161(6):1205-8.
doi: 10.2214/ajr.161.6.8249726.

Pharyngography after head and neck irradiation: differentiation of postirradiation edema from recurrent tumor

Affiliations

Pharyngography after head and neck irradiation: differentiation of postirradiation edema from recurrent tumor

S P Quillin et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: In patients previously irradiated for head and neck carcinomas, persistent soft-tissue thickening in the larynx and pharynx makes it difficult to distinguish between postirradiation edema and recurrent epidermoid carcinoma. The goal of this work was to characterize the standard double-contrast pharyngographic appearance after irradiation and to differentiate this appearance from that of recurrent or residual neoplasms.

Materials and methods: The posttreatment pharynogograms in 43 patients treated with radiotherapy for malignant tumors of the head and neck were retrospectively reviewed. The pharynx had been included in the radiation field in each case. We characterized the posttherapy appearance and identified radiographic signs that could be used to distinguish normal postirradiation edema from recurrent tumor.

Results: Soft-tissue thickening of normal laryngeal and pharyngeal structures and laryngotracheal aspiration were common nonspecific findings on posttherapy pharyngograms, each occurring in 39 of 43 patients. Epiglottic enlargement and laryngotracheal aspiration did not correlate with the presence of residual or recurrent neoplasm. Asymmetric swelling was more common ipsilateral to the original neoplasm and did not necessarily indicate a malignant tumor. Mucosal irregularity, ulceration, and a demonstrable focal mass were the only significant predictors of recurrent or residual tumor; at least one of the three findings was present in 17 of 19 patients with neoplasm correctly identified by pharyngography.

Conclusion: Double-contrast pharyngography is a useful means of diagnosing pharyngeal tumors in patients who have had radiation therapy. Radiographic signs of neoplasm (ulcer, mucosal irregularity, and a focal mass) can be used to distinguish recurrent tumor from nonmalignant changes after irradiation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources