doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.121.
Computerised perimetry with moving and steady fixation in children
Affiliations
- PMID: 8253238
- DOI: 10.1038/eye.1993.121
Item in Clipboard
Computerised perimetry with moving and steady fixation in children
Eye (Lond).
1993.
Abstract
The computer assisted moving eye campimeter (CAMEC) maintains the patient's interest and fixation by using a moving fixation target which must be tracked by the patient using a joystick for the test to proceed. In this study, 32 children were examined with the blind spot test programs of both CAMEC and the Dicon Auto-Perimeter. Among those who completed both tests the blind spot was detected in 18 eyes (75%) by the Dicon Auto-Perimeter and in 24 eyes (100%) by CAMEC. The mean CAMEC score (61.0%) was significantly higher than the mean Dicon Auto-Perimeter score (26.6%). CAMEC allowed better detection and quantification of scotomas in patients more than 4 years of age.
Similar articles
-
Clustering of fixation targets in multifixation campimetry.Eye (Lond). 1993;7 ( Pt 1):131-3. doi: 10.1038/eye.1993.27. Eye (Lond). 1993. PMID: 8325402
-
Eccentric fixation in Stargardt's disease assessed by Tübingen perimetry.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Dec;48(12):5815-22. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-0367. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007. PMID: 18055836
-
Visual-field defects in well-defined retinal lesions using Humphrey and Dicon perimeters.Optometry. 2000 Oct;71(10):643-52. Optometry. 2000. PMID: 11063269
-
Topographical reproducibility of small scotoma using computerised dynamic fixation target.Doc Ophthalmol. 1995-1996;91(3):223-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01204173. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995. PMID: 8886586
-
[CAU--an accessory device for automatic monitoring and evaluation of fixation with the computer perimeter Competer].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1985 Oct;187(4):303-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1054318. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1985. PMID: 4068599 German.
Cited by
-
Comparison of visual field test results obtained through Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry versus standard automated perimetry in healthy children.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Oct;61(10):576-9. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.119322. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 24145558 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Pediatric Visual Field Test.Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016 Dec 14;5(6):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.5.6.13. eCollection 2016 Dec. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016. PMID: 27980876 Free PMC article.
-
Normal values for Octopus tendency oriented perimetry in children 7 through 13 years old.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Sep;243(9):886-93. doi: 10.1007/s00417-005-1134-9. Epub 2005 Apr 15. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005. PMID: 15834603
-
A case control study examining the feasibility of using eye tracking perimetry to differentiate patients with glaucoma from healthy controls.Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 12;11(1):839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80401-2. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33436922 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability of kinetic visual field testing in children with mutation-proven retinal dystrophies: Implications for therapeutic clinical trials.Ophthalmic Genet. 2018 Jan-Feb;39(1):22-28. doi: 10.1080/13816810.2017.1329447. Epub 2017 Jul 13. Ophthalmic Genet. 2018. PMID: 28704108 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
