Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Jul;8(7):1093-7.
doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138199.

Comparison of two local anaesthetics in transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of two local anaesthetics in transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval

H Godoy et al. Hum Reprod. 1993 Jul.

Abstract

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval is an accepted procedure in most in-vitro fertilization programmes. In order to simplify the anaesthetic procedure into a minimally invasive one, we perform the oocyte retrieval under a modified para-cervical block combined with a standard pre-medication. In order to maximize the patient's comfort we evaluated two different local anaesthetics and their side-effects. Patients were allocated at random to receive a modified para-cervical block with mepivacaine 1% (n = 46) or with prilocaine 1% (n = 54). The patients were asked to fill in a visual analogue scale (VAS) including assessment of anxiety, pain and comfort concerning the procedure. The two local anaesthetics were both effective in reducing pain during transvaginal oocyte retrieval. The mean VAS scores were acceptable and were efficient as indicators of patient's comfort during the procedure. Mepivacaine was selected for routine use since prilocaine induced methaemoglobinaemia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources