Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Apr-Jun;35(2):51-7.

Comparative efficacy of oral sustained released bronchodilator in stable asthmatics

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8258465
Clinical Trial

Comparative efficacy of oral sustained released bronchodilator in stable asthmatics

D N Koyande et al. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1993 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Double blind randomized trial of oral conventional and sustained release bronchodilators was undertaken to observe comparative efficacy in 30 patients older than 15 years. All cases selected were stable asthmatics at least for last 2 years having FEV1 improvement > or = 20%. Basal Pulmonary functions like FEV1, FVC and PEFR were recorded before and after drug administration at 1/2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 24 hours. Four drug regimens were given as a single dose in the morning on randomized crossover manner on 1st, 4th, 7th and 10th days, sustained release theophylline 300 mg+salbutamol 4 mg (Drug I), salbutamol 4 mg + theophylline 300 mg (Drug II), salbutamol sustained released (asthalin SA) 8 mg (Drug III), salbutamol sustained released (ventorlin CR) 8 mg (Drug IV). Mean FEV1 changes observed at 0, 6 and 12 hours for all the drugs were compared which showed no statistical significance (t = 2.3876). Therefore, we conclude that using single dose fixed combination of oral salbutamol and aminophylline either in a plain or slow released form have no additive bronchodilator effect as compared to salbutamol alone in stable asthmatics.

PubMed Disclaimer