Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 Sep;70(2):393-406.
doi: 10.1079/bjn19930134.

No major differences in energy metabolism between matched and unmatched groups of 'large-eating' and 'small-eating' men

Affiliations
Comparative Study

No major differences in energy metabolism between matched and unmatched groups of 'large-eating' and 'small-eating' men

D Clark et al. Br J Nutr. 1993 Sep.

Abstract

Rates of energy expenditure (J/kg fat-free mass (FFM) per min) in normal weight, 'small-eating' men were compared with those obtained for normal weight (n 8) and underweight (n 5) 'large-eating' men. For the matched groups of 'large-' and 'small-eaters' there were no differences in resting metabolic rate (RMR) measurements but during controlled daily activities there was a small but significant increase (P < 0.05) in energy expenditure in the 'large-eaters'. These results contrast with those obtained for the unmatched groups where energy requirements were about 10% (P < 0.01) higher in the underweight 'large-eaters' at rest but were not different during the more energetic (walking) activities. However, after adjustment for differences in FFM between these two groups, the resting energy expenditures of the 'large-eaters' (82.54 (SE 1.51) J/kg FFM per min) were similar to those of the 'small-eaters' (81.87 (SE 1.51) J/kg FFM per min). Oral temperatures were significantly higher in the matched (0.35-0.65 degrees) and unmatched (0.7-0.9 degrees) 'large-eaters' both at rest and during the different activities, but the thermic effect of food (50 kJ/kg FFM) was one fifth lower (not significant) in both groups of 'large-eaters'. These results provide little evidence for any major metabolic differences between groups of 'large-eating' and 'small-eating' men.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources