Does carotid eversion endarterectomy and reimplantation reduce the risk of restenosis?
- PMID: 8268085
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02002123
Does carotid eversion endarterectomy and reimplantation reduce the risk of restenosis?
Abstract
Two hundred twelve eversion endarterectomies of the internal carotid artery and reimplantation in the common carotid artery were performed between January 1985 and July 1990. A total of 206 patients with stenosis of 75% or more and with redundancy and tortuosity of the internal carotid artery underwent this procedure. Cumulative mortality and neurologic morbidity were 2.4%. Forty patients died during the course of follow-up, seven of neurologic causes (17.1%). Duplex scans of 107 operated carotid arteries were obtained an average of 27.1 months after surgery. Restenosis of > 50% was encountered in three patients (1.9%), two asymptomatic patients (1.3%) with > 75% restenosis and one symptomatic patient with occlusion (0.6%). These results contrast with a 13.5% rate of restenoses > 50% (including 5.9% of restenoses > 75% and 1.7% occlusions) observed after 156 consecutive endarterectomies performed and closed by direct suture by the same surgical team in 1987 at a mean follow-up of 44 months. We believe that this technique can be used more often because the the operative and long-term risks are not any greater than those of the other methods of carotid revascularization. Eversion endarterectomy associated with reimplantation is especially indicated when the internal carotid artery is elongated, is < 4 mm wide, and occurs in women.
Similar articles
-
Eversion carotid endarterectomy: a technical alternative that may obviate patch closure in women.Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Oct;11(5):347-52. doi: 10.1016/S0967-2109(03)00076-0. Cardiovasc Surg. 2003. PMID: 12958544
-
[Carotid endarterectomy by eversion and reimplantation. Techniques and results].J Mal Vasc. 1997 Jul;22(3):168-72. J Mal Vasc. 1997. PMID: 9303932 Review. French.
-
Modified eversion carotid endarterectomy.Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;27(2):178-85. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Jun 28. Ann Vasc Surg. 2013. PMID: 22749323
-
A fifteen-year experience with carotid endarterectomy after a formal operative protocol requiring highly frequent patch angioplasty.J Vasc Surg. 2000 Apr;31(4):724-35. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.104591. J Vasc Surg. 2000. PMID: 10753280
-
Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique.Adv Surg. 1999;33:459-76. Adv Surg. 1999. PMID: 10572580 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
A comparison of results with eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy from the Vascular Quality Initiative and the Mid-America Vascular Study Group.J Vasc Surg. 2015 May;61(5):1216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.01.049. J Vasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 25925539 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective randomized study on bilateral carotid endarterectomy: patching versus eversion.Ann Surg. 2000 Jul;232(1):119-25. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200007000-00017. Ann Surg. 2000. PMID: 10862204 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Open therapy of carotid stenosis by endarterectomy].Chirurg. 2004 Jul;75(7):658-66. doi: 10.1007/s00104-004-0872-2. Chirurg. 2004. PMID: 15221089 German.
-
Carotid endarterectomy by eversion technique: its safety and durability.Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):471-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00004. Ann Surg. 1998. PMID: 9790337 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy for preventing stroke.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;2000(1):CD001921. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001921. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. PMID: 11279740 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical