Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Aug;3(4):339-43.
doi: 10.1089/lps.1993.3.339.

Rectopexy

Affiliations

Rectopexy

A J Senagore et al. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1993 Aug.

Abstract

Many surgical procedures have been described for the management of full-thickness rectal prolapse. Currently, the three procedures most frequently used are anterior resection with or without suture rectopexy, transabdominal mesh fixation without resection, and perineal proctosigmoidectomy. Only the latter procedure avoids a laparotomy, and the mesh fixation technique has a high incidence of severe constipation postoperatively. Recently, there have been two reports of laparoscopic mesh fixation for rectal prolapse which were successful. However, the long-term concerns are probably very similar. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to report a series of 6 laparoscopic-assisted anterior resections performed for rectal prolapse at Ferguson-Blodgett Hospital from January 1, 1992 through October 30, 1992. There were no perioperative mortalities and the only complication was a port site bleed which required re-exploration. The mean time for resumption of oral intake was 2.75 +/- 1.5 days and the length of hospital stay was 4.0 +/- 0.8 days. No early recurrences (< 1 yr) have been noted in this series. The authors feel that laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection is a safe and effective method of treating full-thickness rectal prolapse, thereby avoiding a laparotomy and reducing hospital stay.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources