Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Sep-Oct;15(5):838-44.

Effect of preinduction cervical softening with dinoprostone gel on outcome of oxytocin-induced labor

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8269450
Clinical Trial

Effect of preinduction cervical softening with dinoprostone gel on outcome of oxytocin-induced labor

K F Trofatter Jr. Clin Ther. 1993 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Five hundred fourteen pregnant women at or near term with medically indicated inductions and unfavorable cervical induction features (Bishop score 0-4) were enrolled in an open-label randomized multicenter clinical trial to study the effect of endocervical administration of 0.5 mg of dinoprostone cervical gel as a preinduction cervical ripening agent. Patients in the treatment group (n = 265) received dinoprostone cervical gel 12 hours prior to oxytocin induction; patients in the control group (n = 249) were observed during this period. Thirteen patients in each group were excluded from efficacy evaluations. All patients were included in safety analysis. A mean Bishop score increase of 2.9 points was achieved in the treatment group, as compared with 0.6 point in the control group (P < 0.001). During the observation period, spontaneous labor occurred in a significantly greater percentage of patients in the treatment group (27%) than in the control group (2%). The percentage of patients who achieved labor either during the observation period or during the initial induction attempt was significantly larger in the dinoprostone cervical gel group (71.8%) than in the control group (54.2%). In addition, there was a statistically significant (P < 0.001) difference in median induction-to-vaginal delivery time for the treatment group (10.6 hr) and the control group (13.0 hr). Side effects were reported for 42% and 35% of patients in the treatment and control groups, respectively, with fetal heart rate abnormalities reported for approximately 27% of patients in each group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types