Clinicopathologic factors influencing survival of patients with bile duct carcinoma: multivariate statistical analysis
- PMID: 8273388
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01659134
Clinicopathologic factors influencing survival of patients with bile duct carcinoma: multivariate statistical analysis
Abstract
To evaluate the influence of various clinicopathologic factors on survival, a computer analysis was performed on 70 patients who underwent resection for bile duct carcinoma. Univariate analysis of overall survival involving all the patients identified 10 factors that were associated with a significant outcome: location of primary lesion (p = 0.01), pancreatic invasion (p = 0.004), duodenal invasion (p = 0.005), macroscopic and microscopic vascular involvement (p = 0.009 and p = 0.04), perineural invasion (p = 0.02), lymphatic vessel involvement (p = 0.04), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.02), histologic type (p = 0.02), and depth of cancer invasion (p = 0.04). However, when the interactive effects of these factors were taken into account, the pancreatic invasion and perineural invasion were selected as the two most significant prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis using the Cox stepwise proportional hazards model. The age, sex, size of the tumor, macroscopic type of lesions, hepatic infiltration, serosal invasion, resected surgical margin at the proximal and distal ends, exposed surgical margin, peritoneal dissemination, and hepatic metastasis were not significantly associated with prognosis.
Similar articles
-
Multivariate statistical analysis of clinicopathologic factors influencing survival of patients with bile duct carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2002 Oct;8(5):943-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v8.i5.943. World J Gastroenterol. 2002. PMID: 12378647 Free PMC article.
-
Multivariate analysis by Cox Proportional Hazards Model on prognoses of patients with bile duct carcinoma after resection.Chin Med J (Engl). 2002 Oct;115(10):1538-41. Chin Med J (Engl). 2002. PMID: 12490105
-
[Significance of positive ductal margin and prognostic factors of surgical resection in middle and distal bile duct carcinoma].Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 May 1;47(9):677-80. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 19615237 Chinese.
-
Surgical treatment in proximal bile duct cancer. A single-center experience.Ann Surg. 1996 Nov;224(5):628-38. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199611000-00007. Ann Surg. 1996. PMID: 8916878 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The survival outcome and prognostic factors for distal cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: a meta-analysis for the 5-year survival.Surg Today. 2017 Mar;47(3):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s00595-016-1362-0. Epub 2016 May 28. Surg Today. 2017. PMID: 27236779 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical behavior and prognostic factors of periampullary adenocarcinoma.Ann Surg. 1995 Nov;222(5):632-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199511000-00005. Ann Surg. 1995. PMID: 7487210 Free PMC article.
-
Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas.Mod Pathol. 2016 Nov;29(11):1358-1369. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.125. Epub 2016 Jul 29. Mod Pathol. 2016. PMID: 27469329 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative frozen section diagnosis of bile duct margin for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Mar 28;24(12):1332-1342. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i12.1332. World J Gastroenterol. 2018. PMID: 29599608 Free PMC article.
-
New classification of cystic duct carcinoma.World J Surg. 2008 Apr;32(4):621-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9324-8. World J Surg. 2008. PMID: 18224484
-
Preoperative cholangitis and metastatic lymph node have a negative impact on survival after resection of extrahepatic bile duct cancer.World J Surg. 2012 Aug;36(8):1842-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1594-0. World J Surg. 2012. PMID: 22526039
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical