Antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in laparoscopic surgery: randomized, double-blind comparison with metoclopramide
- PMID: 8280551
- DOI: 10.1093/bja/71.6.845
Antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron in laparoscopic surgery: randomized, double-blind comparison with metoclopramide
Abstract
In a randomized, double-blind study, we have compared the prophylactic antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron with that of metoclopramide in 123 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery. The patients received either i.v. ondansetron 4 mg or metoclopramide 10 mg immediately before a standard anaesthetic. The number of patients with no nausea or vomiting in the ondansteron group was 50 (82%) compared with 29 (47%) in the metoclopramide group (P < 0.001). In those patients with a previous history of postoperative nausea and vomiting, nausea was less severe in those receiving ondansetron compared with those receiving metoclopramide (P < 0.05). We conclude that preoperative prophylactic administration of i.v. ondansetron was superior to metoclopramide in preventing nausea and vomiting after general anaesthesia for day-case gynaecological laparoscopic surgery.
Comment in
-
Which routine antiemetic: ondansetron or prochlorperazine?Br J Anaesth. 1994 Aug;73(2):280. doi: 10.1093/bja/73.2.280-a. Br J Anaesth. 1994. PMID: 7917757 No abstract available.
-
Antiemetics in laparoscopic surgery.Br J Anaesth. 1994 May;72(5):608-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.5.608. Br J Anaesth. 1994. PMID: 8048977 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical