Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 Dec;48(6):386-91.
doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81106-7.

Imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Imaging neuroendocrine tumours with radiolabelled somatostatin analogues and X-ray computed tomography: a comparative study

C M King et al. Clin Radiol. 1993 Dec.

Abstract

Various endocrine neoplasms, including a number of carcinoid and pancreatic islet cell tumours, express somatostatin receptors. These tumours may be difficult to localize using conventional techniques. Radiolabelled somatostatin analogues 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide and 111In-pentatreotide have been used for imaging these tumours. In a retrospective study of 24 patients, the sensitivities of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and X-ray computed tomography (CT) were compared. Ten patients were scanned using 123I-Tyr-3-octreotide and 14 with 111In-pentatreotide. All patients had CT scans. Twenty patients had neuroendocrine tumours with a total of 45 lesions in the anatomical areas included on both scans. CT detected 42 while somatostatin receptor scanning detected 31 of these lesions. Three lesions were missed by CT which were detected by scintigraphy, and there were six CT false positive lesions. In a further four patients investigated for suspected neuroendocrine tumours, no lesion was shown using either modality and subsequent investigations and clinical follow-up have shown no evidence of a tumour. We conclude that while CT is more sensitive than somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, the techniques are complementary, especially in patients with disseminated pathology, equivocal lesions on CT, or a negative CT and strong clinical or biochemical evidence of a neuroendocrine tumour.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types