Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Feb;89(2):184-8.

Intrahepatic arteriovenous shunting due to hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis, and its change by transcatheter arterial embolization

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8304300

Intrahepatic arteriovenous shunting due to hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis, and its change by transcatheter arterial embolization

S Sugano et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate intrahepatic arteriovenous shunt rate due to cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), complicated by cirrhosis, and its change after transcatheter arterial embolization.

Methods: The shunt rate was measured by hepatic artery infusion of labeled macroaggregated albumin. Counts were taken over the liver and both lungs for calculation of the shunt rate: cpm in lungs divided by (cpm in liver and lungs) x 100%.

Results: The intrahepatic arteriovenous shunt rate of cirrhosis ranged from 6.8% to 16.6% (12.6% +/- 3.4%, mean +/- SD). In HCC, it ranged from 7.2% to 27.1% (16.0% +/- 4.9%, mean +/- SD). The difference between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). When the liver was more than 20% replaced by tumor, the intrahepatic arteriovenous shunt rate was higher than when less than 20% occupied (n = 6, 20.1% +/- 4.8% vs. n = 15, 14.4% +/- 4.0%; p < 0.05). Although the former was significantly different from liver cirrhosis, the latter was not significantly different from the shunt rate observed in liver cirrhosis without HCC. After transcatheter arterial embolization, excluding one patient who developed a visible hepatofugal arterioportal shunt, the mean change in shunt rate between the effective treatment group (n = 9, -2.1% +/- 2.8%, mean +/- SD) and the ineffective treatment group (n = 5, 3.0% +/- 3.3%, mean +/- SD) was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: We found that intrahepatic arteriovenous shunt rate more sensitively detects intrahepatic arteriovenous shunting due to HCC than does angiography alone. Measuring intrahepatic arteriovenous stunt rate may provide useful information regarding response to treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources