Validity of CPITN's assumptions of hierarchical occurrence of periodontal conditions in a Kenyan population aged 15-65 years

Abstract

In order to study the validity of the hierarchical principle of the CPITN we used data originating in a cross-sectional study of periodontal disease in a random sample comprising 1131 Kenyans aged 15-65 yr to determine, for each tooth present in each individual, the absence or presence of gingival bleeding, of dental calculus, of a pocket of 4-5 mm or a pocket of 6+ mm, such that each tooth had a separate recording for bleeding, calculus, pocket 4-5 mm and pocket 6+ mm. According to the hierarchical principle of CPITN a tooth with pockets as the most severe finding is assumed positive also for calculus and bleeding, and a tooth with calculus as the most severe finding is assumed positive also for bleeding. Our analysis showed that calculus as the most severe finding of a tooth overestimates the occurrence of bleeding by up to 18%, depending on age of the individuals and the set of teeth examined. Pockets as the most severe finding in a tooth overestimates the occurrence of bleeding by up to 13%, and overestimates calculus by up to 54%, most pronounced in the younger age groups. The effect of these overestimations on prevalence and severity estimates was the most pronounced for the severity measures, particularly regarding the severity of bleeding, whereas prevalence estimates remained relatively unaffected. Undoubtedly, this result should be seen in the light of a very high prevalence and severity of both bleeding and calculus in this population.