Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 Dec;31(12):3336-9.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3336-3339.1993.

Reliability of the E test for detection of ampicillin, vancomycin, and high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus spp

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Reliability of the E test for detection of ampicillin, vancomycin, and high-level aminoglycoside resistance in Enterococcus spp

J E Schulz et al. J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec.

Abstract

By comparison with agar dilution results, the E test was investigated for the ability to detect high-level aminoglycoside (gentamicin and streptomycin), ampicillin, and vancomycin resistance among strains representing six enterococcal species. For ampicillin and vancomycin, disk diffusion results also were obtained. No false high-level aminoglycoside resistance occurred, and no false gentamicin susceptibility was noted. With the high-range streptomycin E test (2,048 micrograms), 24% of the 38 resistant strains were falsely susceptible. However, these discordances could likely be reconciled by adjustments in incubation duration and by using broth microdilution rather than agar screen breakpoint criteria, or by using the lower-range (1,024-micrograms) strip. For ampicillin, category results obtained by E test and disk diffusion showed good agreement with agar dilution; E test MICs were generally comparable to agar dilution MICs. The E test was more sensitive than disk diffusion for detecting vancomycin-intermediate strains, but for these strains and those exhibiting low-level vancomycin resistance (MIC, 32 to 128 micrograms/ml), disk diffusion and E test inhibition zones must be interpreted with caution. Given the reliability of E test for detecting resistance to anti-enterococcal agents, the decision to use this method should be based on convenience, cost, testing frequency, and satisfaction with currently used methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2525-8 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Nov;36(11):2355-9 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1989 Apr 1;110(7):515-20 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1989 Apr;27(4):731-4 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989 Sep;33(9):1588-91 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources