Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Dec;52(12):886-90.
doi: 10.1136/ard.52.12.886.

The GALS locomotor screen and disability

Affiliations

The GALS locomotor screen and disability

M J Plant et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 1993 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Examination of the locomotor system is frequently neglected. Therefore, the GALS locomotor screen (Gait, Arms, Legs, Spine) has been proposed by Doherty et al as a practical method of identifying functionally important problems. This study was designed to test whether this screen reflects functional impairment, as measured by accepted health status measures.

Methods: Two observers performed the GALS screen in a total of 83 patients with a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. The examination components of GALS were rated by a simple 0 to 3 scale. Physical ability was further assessed by Health Activity Questionnaire (HAQ), Barthel index and Steinbrocker's ARA classification.

Results: For the total patient group, Spearman correlations between GALS and the three functional indices were good (r = 0.62 to 0.71, p < 0.001). Correlations were equally good for rheumatoid arthritis patients alone (r = 0.65 to 0.70, p < 0.001), but less good although still significant for the other miscellaneous rheumatic conditions (r = 0.31 to 0.46, p < 0.05). Observed proportional agreement between the two observers for the individual scores was > 70%, with a kappa statistic k = 0.49 to 0.74.

Conclusions: The GALS screen is a reliable and valid measure of functional ability, compared with standard accepted indices in a variety of musculoskeletal diseases. This supports the proposal for its use as a screening test by general practitioners and medical students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):137-45 - PubMed
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1992 Oct;51(10):1165-9 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1985 May;28(5):542-7 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1985 Jun;28(6):680-5 - PubMed
    1. Br J Rheumatol. 1986 May;25(2):206-9 - PubMed