Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 1993 Nov-Dec;12(6 Pt 2):S319-27.

Pediatric retransplantation

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8312351
Multicenter Study

Pediatric retransplantation

R E Michler et al. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1993 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Previous studies have attempted to outline the efficacy of heart retransplantation in adults. A limited number of these retransplantation procedures have been performed in children; however, no study to date has evaluated the risk of heart retransplantation in this specific patient population. We conducted a retrospective review of 17 pediatric (non-neonatal) heart transplant recipients who subsequently underwent heart retransplantation. Thirteen male and four female patients underwent retransplantation at four different institutions between 1974 and 1992. Patient age at the time of primary transplantation ranged from 2 to 19 years (mean, 12.5 years) and from 3 to 30 years (mean, 16 years) at retransplantation. The time interval between transplantation procedures ranged from 2 days to 15.6 years and was not predictive of patient outcome. Follow-up after retransplantation ranged from 1 day to 11 years (mean, 2.8 years). All patients were New York Heart Association class 3 or class 4 at the time of retransplantation. After retransplantation all survivors were New York Heart Association class 1. No patient had mechanical device implantation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation bridge-to-transplantation at primary transplantation or retransplantation. The indication for retransplantation was transplant coronary artery disease (TxCAD) in seven patients (41.2%), acute rejection in four (23.5%), chronic rejection in one (5.8%), chronic rejection associated with TxCAD in four (23.5%), and intraoperative donor organ failure in one (5.8%). No significant difference occurred in linearized rates of rejection or infection or in actuarial freedom from rejection or infection when secondary grafts were compared with primary grafts in patients undergoing retransplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources