Similar articles

• [The quality of digital mammograms. Development and use of phantoms for optimal safety].

  Schöfer H, Kotsianos D, Wirth S, Britsch S, Reiser M. Schöfer H, et al. Radiologe. 2005 Mar;45(3):278-85. doi: 10.1007/s00117-005-1180-7. Radiologe. 2005. PMID: 15747150 German.
• [The technique and results of mammography].

  Friedrich M. Friedrich M. Radiologe. 1993 May;33(5):243-59. Radiologe. 1993. PMID: 8516435 Review. German.
• FDA approves system for digital mammography.

  White J. White J. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Mar 15;92(6):442. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.6.442. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000. PMID: 10716954 No abstract available.
• Implementing digital quality control in a breast center.

  Parikh J, Fanus D. Parikh J, et al. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Nov;1(11):854-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2004.05.006. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004. PMID: 17411717 Review.
• Guideline for determining the mean glandular dose according to DIN 6868-162 and threshold contrast visibility according to the quality assurance guideline for digital mammography systems.

  Sommer A, Schopphoven S, Land I, Blaser D, Sobczak T; Deutsche Referenzzentren für Mammographie Version 2.0. Sommer A, et al. Rofo. 2014 May;186(5):474-81. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1356284. Epub 2014 Feb 20. Rofo. 2014. PMID: 24557600