Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 May;172(4):425-38.
doi: 10.1007/BF00213524.

Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Acoustic, auditory, and morphological divergence in three species of neotropical frog

W Wilczynski et al. J Comp Physiol A. 1993 May.

Abstract

Advertisement calls, auditory tuning, and larynx and ear morphology were examined in 3 neotropical frogs, Hyla microcephala, H. phlebodes and H. ebraccata, H. microcephala has the highest call dominant frequency (6.068 kHz) and basilar papilla tuning (5.36 kHz). H. phlebodes and H. ebraccata calls have lower dominant frequencies (3.832 and 3.197 kHz respectively) and basilar papilla tuning (2.79 and 2.56 kHz). The primary call notes of H. ebraccata are longer (181.6 ms) than those of H. microcephala (95.5 ms) or H. phlebodes (87.3 ms). Morphometric analysis suggests that temporal call features differ as laryngeal musculature changes, in the process changing the overall size of the larynx. The spectral aspects of the call differ as head size, and hence the size of its resonating and radiating structures, changes, modifying the dominant frequency of calls by accentuating their higher harmonics when head size decreases. Decreasing head size decreases the size of the middle and inner ear chambers, changing the mechanical tuning of the ear in the same direction as the change in dominant frequency. These changes result in divergent spectral-temporal characteristics of both the sending and receiving portions of the acoustic communication system underlying social behavior in these frogs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Prog Neurobiol. 1984;22(1):1-38 - PubMed
    1. Prog Neurobiol. 1990;34(4):313-29 - PubMed
    1. Brain Behav Evol. 1986;28(1-3):60-9 - PubMed
    1. Brain Behav Evol. 1992;39(4):229-37 - PubMed
    1. J Comp Physiol A. 1987 Oct;161(5):659-69 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources