Regional wall motion analysis predicts survival and functional outcome after subendocardial resection in patients with prior anterior myocardial infarction
- PMID: 8319358
- DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.1.70
Regional wall motion analysis predicts survival and functional outcome after subendocardial resection in patients with prior anterior myocardial infarction
Abstract
Background: Subendocardial resection is an established surgical technique for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia associated with prior myocardial infarction. Preoperative factors predictive of survival and functional outcome after surgery have not been completely characterized. We hypothesized that a quantitative assessment of regional wall motion would be a sensitive predictor of both survival and functional outcome after subendocardial resection. This was retrospectively tested in a group of 80 patients with prior anterior myocardial infarction who had undergone subendocardial resection for sustained ventricular tachycardia at out institution.
Methods and results: Centerline chord motion analysis was used to derive a wall motion score from the preoperative contrast right anterior oblique ventriculogram. Multivariate analysis revealed wall motion score to be a significant independent predictor of both long-term survival (p < 0.01) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class I or II status at 6 months (p < 0.01) and at 24 months (p < 0.001) after surgery. Patients with a wall motion score of > 16%, compared with patients with a wall motion score of < or = 16%, had a better 5-year actuarial survival (74% versus 45%, p = 0.02) and were more likely to be NYHA class I or II at 6 months (87% versus 58%, p < 0.01) and at 24 months (82% versus 34%, p < 0.0001) after subendocardial resection.
Conclusions: A wall motion score derived from centerline chord motion analysis is a sensitive predictor of survival and functional outcome after subendocardial resection. Patients with a wall motion score of > 16% have an excellent prognosis after subendocardial resection. In contrast, patients with a wall motion score of < or = 16% have a poorer outcome and should be considered candidates only if other forms of therapy have failed or are unavailable.
Comment in
-
Meaning of ejection fraction after subendocardial resection.Circulation. 1994 Apr;89(4):1906. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.89.4.1906. Circulation. 1994. PMID: 8149559 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the usefulness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and subendocardial resection in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias and poor regional wall motion associated with coronary artery disease.Am J Cardiol. 1993 Sep 15;72(9):652-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90879-h. Am J Cardiol. 1993. PMID: 8249839
-
Use of a regional wall motion score to enhance risk stratification of patients receiving an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Oct;22(4):1093-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90421-v. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993. PMID: 8409046
-
The long-term outcome of visually directed subendocardial resection in patients without inducible or mappable ventricular tachycardia at the time of surgery.J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994 May;5(5):399-407. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1994.tb01178.x. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1994. PMID: 8055144
-
[Transmural heterogeneity of the left ventricular wall: subendocardial layer and subepicardial layer].J Cardiol. 2000 Mar;35(3):205-18. J Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10808428 Review. Japanese.
-
Comparison between abnormalities in segmental endocardial motion and abnormalities in segmental wall thickening after anterior myocardial infarction. A cine-magnetic resonance study.Eur Heart J. 1996 Sep;17(9):1350-61. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015069. Eur Heart J. 1996. PMID: 8880020 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical