Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 May;46(5):408-10.
doi: 10.1136/jcp.46.5.408.

Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of sensitivity of 10 diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis by use of a simple laboratory procedure

B J Thomas et al. J Clin Pathol. 1993 May.

Abstract

Aims: To determine the sensitivity of commercially available diagnostic assays for Chlamydia trachomatis using a simple method.

Methods: Nine commercial assays and an "in-house" polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were evaluated using serial dilutions of a laboratory grown H serovar--four of them using a laboratory grown E serovar. Seven of the assays were further tested using dilutions of several cervical samples known to contain chlamydiae.

Results: The most sensitive assays were the MicroTrak direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test (Syva) and the PCR which detected C trachomatis at a 10(-8) dilution of the H serovar, while the two least sensitive, Clearview (Unipath) and TestPack (Abbott), were positive only at 10(-4) and-3 dilutions, respectively. A range of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and a nucleic acid hybridisation test were of intermediate sensitivity. The results with serovar E were consistent with these. When clinical samples were examined, the DFA test detected C trachomatis in dilutions at least 10-fold greater than any other assay.

Conclusions: The range of sensitivity of diagnostic assays determined by the laboratory dilution procedure is very wide. Sensitivity assessed in this way, however, reflects the ability of the assays to detect C trachomatis in large scale clinical trials. The dilution procedure, which is simple to undertake, could therefore be applied by any laboratory before a new diagnostic method is considered for routine use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1977 Sep;6(3):285-92 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jul;37(7):812-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1991 Apr;44(4):321-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1989 Jul;42(7):759-62 - PubMed
    1. Int J STD AIDS. 1990 Jul;1(4):264-7 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances