Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study

Abstract

We compared conventional plain radiography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US) with respect to their suitability for detecting foreign bodies in soft tissue in an in vitro model using a cow tongue to simulate orofacial soft tissues. Four samples of different sizes of fractured tooth crown, pieces of amalgam, glass, asphalt, composite, dry wood, and stone were each embedded under a 2-cm-thick flap on the caudal surface of the tongue. Plain radiographs revealed all the materials except wood, and there was some variation in the subjectively evaluated radiopacity of the materials which indicated the nature of the foreign bodies concerned. MRI proved to be the least suitable imaging method, as particles with a metallic content gave rise to powerful interference artifacts. CT and especially US proved to be suitable imaging methods for foreign-body detection in soft tissue. Amalgam produced a metallic streaking artifact in CT, which visualized wood as gas density, and depicted all the other materials as similar hyperdense masses. Ultrasound was both sensitive and specific in detecting foreign bodies in soft tissue. The particles were better defined in form and size with CT and US than with MRI or plain radiography. We conclude that when plain radiographs, history, and clinical examination fail to reveal the presence of superficial foreign bodies, US or CT can serve as an alternative method.