Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Jun;8(6):311-7.
doi: 10.1007/BF02600144.

Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Requiring physicians to respond to computerized reminders improves their compliance with preventive care protocols

D K Litzelman et al. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To improve compliance with computer-generated reminders to perform fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), mammography, and cervical Papanicolaou (Pap) testing.

Design: Six-month prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: Academic primary care general internal medicine practice.

Subjects: Thirty-one general internal medicine faculty, 145 residents, and 5,407 patients with scheduled visits who were eligible for any of the three cancer screening protocols.

Intervention: Primary care teams of internal medicine residents and faculty received either routine computer reminders (control) or the same remainders to which they were required to circle one of four responses: 1) "done/order today," 2) "not applicable to this patient," 3) "patient refused," or 4) "next visit."

Results: Intervention physicians complied more frequently than control physicians with all remainders combined (46% vs 38%, respectively, p = 0.002) and separately with remainders for FOBT (61% vs 49%, p = 0.0007) and mammography (54% vs 47%, p = 0.036) but not cervical Pap testing (21% vs 18%, p = 0.2). Intervention residents responded significantly more often than control residents to all reminders together and separately to reminders for FOBT and mammography but not Pap testing. There was no significant difference between intervention and control faculty, but the compliance rate for control faculty was significantly higher than the rate for control residents for all reminders together and separately for FOBT but not mammography or Pap testing. The intervention's effect was greatest for patients > or = 70 years old, with significant results for all tests, together and singly, for residents but not faculty. Intervention physicians felt that the reminders were not applicable 21% of the time (due to inadequate data in patient's electronic medical records) and stated that their patients refused 10% of the time.

Conclusions: Requiring physicians to respond to computer-generated reminders improved their compliance with preventive care protocols, especially for elderly patients for whom control physicians' compliance was the lowest. However, 100% compliance with cancer screening remainders will be unattainable due to incomplete data and patient refusal.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Public Health. 1990 May;80(5):527-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1990 May 24;322(21):1499-504 - PubMed
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1988 May;148(5):1177-81 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1991 Jul 24-31;266(4):538-44 - PubMed
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1984 Jan;100(1):130-8 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources