A comparison of flash electroretinograms recorded from Burian Allen, JET, C-glide, gold foil, DTL and skin electrodes
- PMID: 8325411
- DOI: 10.1038/eye.1993.36
A comparison of flash electroretinograms recorded from Burian Allen, JET, C-glide, gold foil, DTL and skin electrodes
Abstract
Single flash scotopic and photopic electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded from the same subjects using six types of corneal electrode, in order to assess their relative effectiveness. In addition, the ERG from a lower eyelid skin electrode was recorded to give an indication of the degree of attenuation to be expected from a skin electrode. On average, the scotopic ERG recorded from the Burian Allen electrode measured 471 microV (100%), and relative to this the b-waves recorded using other electrodes were as follows: JET (89%), C-glide (77%), gold foil (56%), DTL (46%) and skin (12%). Under photopic conditions the order was the same and the interelectrode proportions similar. The b-wave amplitude recorded using the Burian Allen electrode was 125 microV (100%), and with other electrodes was as follows: JET (93%), C-glide (78%), gold foil (60%), DTL (60%) and skin (14%).
Similar articles
-
The repeatability and variability of the multifocal electroretinogram for four different electrodes.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997 Nov;17(6):530-5. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1997. PMID: 9666928
-
Amplitude scaling relationships of Burian-Allen, gold foil and Dawson, Trick and Litzkow electrodes.Doc Ophthalmol. 1995;89(3):235-48. doi: 10.1007/BF01203377. Doc Ophthalmol. 1995. PMID: 7555591
-
Comparison of performance and patient satisfaction of two types of ERG electrodes.Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2007 Apr;224(4):265-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-962856. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2007. PMID: 17458789
-
Skin ERGs: their effectiveness in paediatric visual assessment, confounding factors, and comparison with ERGs recorded using various types of corneal electrode.Int J Psychophysiol. 1994 May;16(2-3):137-46. doi: 10.1016/0167-8760(89)90040-8. Int J Psychophysiol. 1994. PMID: 8089032 Review.
-
Electroretinography.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1085:17-20. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-95046-4_5. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018. PMID: 30578478 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of DTL and gold cup skin electrodes for recordings of the multifocal electroretinogram.Doc Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;146(1):67-78. doi: 10.1007/s10633-022-09912-9. Epub 2022 Dec 20. Doc Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 36536110 Free PMC article.
-
Comparisons of contact lens, foil, fiber and skin electrodes for patterns electroretinograms.Doc Ophthalmol. 1997-1998;94(4):327-40. doi: 10.1007/BF02580858. Doc Ophthalmol. 1997. PMID: 9858093
-
Early diagnosis of Stargardt disease with multifocal electroretinogram in children.Int Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;34(3):613-21. doi: 10.1007/s10792-013-9812-9. Epub 2013 Jun 13. Int Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 23760584
-
All-printed stretchable corneal sensor on soft contact lenses for noninvasive and painless ocular electrodiagnosis.Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 9;12(1):1544. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21916-8. Nat Commun. 2021. PMID: 33750806 Free PMC article.
-
Eccentricity Dependency of Retinal Electrophysiological Deficits in People With Episodic Migraine.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Sep 3;65(11):44. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.11.44. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024. PMID: 39330986 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources