Similar articles

• Technical and clinical assessment of fluorescence in situ hybridization: an ACMG/ASHG position statement. I. Technical considerations. Test and Technology Transfer Committee.

  Test and Technology Transfer Committee, American College of Medical Genetics, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3998, United States.. Test and Technology Transfer Committee, American College of Medical Genetics, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3998, United States.. Genet Med. 2000 Nov-Dec;2(6):356-61. doi: 10.1097/00125817-200011000-00011. Genet Med. 2000. PMID: 11339659 No abstract available.
• Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2-year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature.

  Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao PN, Lese CM, Rita D, Wyandt H, Gersen S, White B, Schoonmaker MM. Tepperberg J, et al. Prenat Diagn. 2001 Apr;21(4):293-301. doi: 10.1002/pd.57. Prenat Diagn. 2001. PMID: 11288120 Review.
• Position statement on interphase in situ hybridization prenatal diagnosis. Report of the Southeastern Regional Genetics Group (SERGG).

  Lubs HA, Elsas LJ 2nd, Tharapel AT, Buchanan PD, Finley WH, Lozzio CB, Pelias MZ. Lubs HA, et al. Am J Med Genet. 1993 Jun 1;46(4):478. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320460431. Am J Med Genet. 1993. PMID: 8357030 No abstract available.
• Rapid Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH).

  Weise A, Liehr T. Weise A, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1885:129-137. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8889-1_9. Methods Mol Biol. 2019. PMID: 30506195
• Detection of chromosomal aberrations in interphase and metaphase cells in prenatal and postnatal studies.

  Kearns WG, Pearson PL. Kearns WG, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 1994;33:459-76. doi: 10.1385/0-89603-280-9:459. Methods Mol Biol. 1994. PMID: 7894591 Review. No abstract available.