Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis
- PMID: 8330173
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800800640
Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis
Abstract
A prospective randomized trial was carried out to determine whether use of a high-pressure closed-suction intraperitoneal drain was associated with a reduction in morbidity rate after colorectal resection and to examine the influence of drainage on postoperative fluid collections. A consecutive series of 148 patients who underwent colonic or colorectal resection were randomized to receive no drain (n = 51) or a high-pressure closed-suction drain for either 3 (n = 47) or 7 (n = 47) days. Three patients were excluded. All patients underwent abdominal ultrasonography on days 3 and 7 and those undergoing left-sided colorectal resection (n = 96) received a water-soluble contrast enema on day 7. The three groups of patients were similar in age, sex, diagnosis and the numbers of sutured and stapled anastomoses. The presence of a drain did not influence the postoperative morbidity or mortality rate. If the anastomosis leaked, neither faeces nor pus emerged from the drain. Ultrasonographic detection of a fluid collection was of no value: such collections bore no relationship to radiological or clinical leaks or the postoperative course. Routine use of a high-pressure suction drain after colorectal resection appears to be unnecessary.
Comment in
-
Randomized trial of drainage of colorectal anastomosis.Br J Surg. 1994 May;81(5):773-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810547. Br J Surg. 1994. PMID: 7980775 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection.Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Mar;38(3):254-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02055597. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995. PMID: 7882787 Clinical Trial.
-
To drain or not to drain in colorectal anastomosis: a meta-analysis.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 May;31(5):951-960. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2509-6. Epub 2016 Jan 30. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016. PMID: 26833470 Free PMC article.
-
Colon and rectal anastomoses do not require routine drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Surg. 1999 Feb;229(2):174-80. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199902000-00003. Ann Surg. 1999. PMID: 10024097 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective randomised study of drains in infra-peritoneal rectal anastomoses.Tech Coloproctol. 2001 Aug;5(2):89-92. doi: 10.1007/s101510170005. Tech Coloproctol. 2001. PMID: 11862564 Clinical Trial.
-
Stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a prospective study.Eur J Surg. 1996 Oct;162(10):805-10. Eur J Surg. 1996. PMID: 8934111 Review.
Cited by
-
To Drain or Not to Drain after Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):1363-8. doi: 10.1007/s12262-015-1259-y. Epub 2015 May 14. Indian J Surg. 2015. PMID: 27011566 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is Prophylactic Drainage of Peritoneal Cavity after Gut Surgery Necessary?: A Non-Randomized Comparative Study from a Teaching Hospital.J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Oct;9(10):PC01-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/8293.6577. Epub 2015 Oct 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015. PMID: 26557562 Free PMC article.
-
Abdominal drainage after elective colorectal surgery: propensity score-matched retrospective analysis of an Italian cohort.BJS Open. 2024 Jan 3;8(1):zrad107. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad107. BJS Open. 2024. PMID: 38170895 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of abdominal drainage systems on postoperative complication rates following liver transplantation.Eur J Med Res. 2015 Aug 21;20(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40001-015-0163-z. Eur J Med Res. 2015. PMID: 26293656 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based value of prophylactic drainage in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analyses.Ann Surg. 2004 Dec;240(6):1074-84; discussion 1084-5. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000146149.17411.c5. Ann Surg. 2004. PMID: 15570212 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources