Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 Jun;16(4):336-9.
doi: 10.1097/00004836-199306000-00016.

Is endoscopic gastric cytology worthwhile? An evaluation of 903 cases of carcinoma

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Is endoscopic gastric cytology worthwhile? An evaluation of 903 cases of carcinoma

X Cussó et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993 Jun.

Abstract

From 1978 to 1989, 4,772 endoscopic cytological examinations of the stomach have been done in our laboratory, including 903 patients with a final diagnosis of gastric carcinoma. There were seven false-positive results among 3,810 examinations done in patients without malignant disease (specificity 99.8%). Cytology yielded positive results in 785 of 903 carcinomas (sensitivity 86.9%), while biopsies were positive in 826 of 895 cases (sensitivity 92.3%). Both techniques combined resulted in positive diagnoses in 886 of 903 malignancies (sensitivity 98.1%). Cytology was positive in 52 patients with negative biopsies as well as in eight patients in whom biopsies had not been obtained. Thus cytology added 60 positive diagnoses (6.7%) to the overall diagnostic results. These results suggest that endoscopic cytology is useful for avoiding unnecessary delays caused by having to perform repeated endoscopic biopsies. It should be done as a routine procedure in those institutions in which significant numbers of gastric carcinomas are studied and where an experienced gastrointestinal cytology laboratory is available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources