Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: TOWED primes FROG
- PMID: 8332414
- DOI: 10.3758/bf03205193
Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: TOWED primes FROG
Abstract
If the phonological codes of visually presented words are assembled rapidly and automatically for use in lexical access, then words that sound alike should induce similar activity within the internal lexicon. TOWED is homophonous with TOAD, which is semantically related to FROG, and BEACH is homophonous with BEECH, which is semantically related to TREE. Stimuli such as these were used in priming-of-naming task, in which words homophonous with associates of the target words preceded the targets at an onset asynchrony of 100 msec. Relative to spelling controls (TROD, BENCH), the low-frequency TOWED and the high-frequency BEACH speeded up the naming of FROG and TREE, respectively, to the same degree. This result was discussed in relation to the accumulating evidence for the primacy of phonological constraints in visual lexical access.
Similar articles
-
Strategic reliance on phonological mediation in lexical access.Mem Cognit. 1997 May;25(3):333-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03211289. Mem Cognit. 1997. PMID: 9184485
-
Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Jun;123(2):107-28. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.123.2.107. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994. PMID: 8014609
-
Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones.J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994 Dec;123(4):331-53. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.123.4.331. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1994. PMID: 7996120
-
When SOFA primes TOUCH: interdependence of spelling, sound, and meaning in "semantically mediated" phonological priming.Mem Cognit. 2001 Apr;29(3):530-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196404. Mem Cognit. 2001. PMID: 11407430 Clinical Trial.
-
Impairments of lexical-semantic processing in aphasia: evidence from the processing of lexical ambiguities.Brain Lang. 1993 Aug;45(2):189-232. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1043. Brain Lang. 1993. PMID: 8358597 Review.
Cited by
-
Orthographically influenced abstract phonological representation: evidence from non-rhotic speakers.J Psycholinguist Res. 2006 Jan;35(1):67-78. doi: 10.1007/s10936-005-9004-5. J Psycholinguist Res. 2006. PMID: 16456643
-
Phonological coding during reading.Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1534-55. doi: 10.1037/a0037830. Epub 2014 Aug 25. Psychol Bull. 2014. PMID: 25150679 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Looks aren't everything: pseudohomophones prime words but nonwords do not.J Psycholinguist Res. 2007 Jan;36(1):47-63. doi: 10.1007/s10936-006-9032-9. J Psycholinguist Res. 2007. PMID: 17221320
-
Strategic reliance on phonological mediation in lexical access.Mem Cognit. 1997 May;25(3):333-44. doi: 10.3758/bf03211289. Mem Cognit. 1997. PMID: 9184485
-
Paws + cause = pause? Memory load and memory blends in homophone recognition.Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Aug;11(4):723-8. doi: 10.3758/bf03196626. Psychon Bull Rev. 2004. PMID: 15581124