[Value of in situ measurement for evaluating effective hearing aid amplification at high sound pressure levels]
- PMID: 8333886
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-997905
[Value of in situ measurement for evaluating effective hearing aid amplification at high sound pressure levels]
Abstract
A careful hearing aid fitting requires consideration of various characteristics of inner ear pathology. The recruitment phenomenon restricts the dynamic range of the impaired hearing and this increase the demands on the hearing aids for a satisfactory correction of the frequency characteristics as well as for an intensity reduction at higher sound pressure level SPL. For years data from coupler or KEMAR (Knowles Electronics Manikin of Acoustical Research) have served to estimate the real ear gain of a hearing aid at higher input levels. In previous papers we reported on some of the differences between coupler measurement and probe tube measurement. The object of this study was to investigate the differences between these two methods at higher input SPL. Therefore, we measured the real ear insertion gain as well as the output characteristics with a 2 cm3 coupler in 80 patients at input levels of 60 dB, 80 dB and 100 dB. The results show differences between the two methods up to 30 dB in both directions in the single patient. Furthermore, the highest compression rate was found in the middle and high frequency range which are crucial for speech discrimination. Consequently, probe tube measurement should be used not only to adjust the frequency characteristics of the hearing aid but also to characterise the real effect of Automatic Gain Control AGC and Peak Clipping PC on insertion gain at higher input SPL. Multichannel hearing aids should be used whenever possible to reduce the disturbances to speech discrimination at low frequencies.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.Scand Audiol Suppl. 1993;38:67-74. Scand Audiol Suppl. 1993. PMID: 8153566
-
Measurement of individual loudness functions by trisection of loudness ranges.Ear Hear. 2008 Oct;29(5):693-703. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318177d9c6. Ear Hear. 2008. PMID: 18769270 Clinical Trial.
-
An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.Ear Hear. 2003 Apr;24(2):157-74. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000058107.64929.D6. Ear Hear. 2003. PMID: 12677112
-
[New aspects of hearing aid fitting].Laryngorhinootologie. 1994 Jan;73(1):7-13. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997072. Laryngorhinootologie. 1994. PMID: 8141956 Review. German.
-
Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.Ear Hear. 1994 Feb;15(1):2-12. Ear Hear. 1994. PMID: 8194676 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous