The need for three stool specimens in routine laboratory examinations for intestinal parasites
- PMID: 8334067
The need for three stool specimens in routine laboratory examinations for intestinal parasites
Abstract
This study was designed to test whether three sequential stool specimens are necessary for reliable detection of intestinal parasites in routine laboratory examinations. There were 175 patients in whom a single species of intestinal parasite or ova was identified on at least one occasion when three stool specimens were examined over a period of 14 days from the first recorded specimen. Examination of a first stool specimen detected parasites and/or ova in 102/175 patients (58.3%); examination of a second specimen identified an additional 36 positive patients (20.6%) and examination of a third specimen yielded a final 37 previously undetected patients (21.1%). These findings indicate that at least three stool specimens should be examined to confirm the presence of intestinal parasites. Even with such practice, it is not possible to guarantee that there is no infestation, but examination of fewer specimens would run a definite risk of false negative results.
Comment in
-
How many stool specimens are enough?Br J Clin Pract. 1994 Nov-Dec;48(6):306. Br J Clin Pract. 1994. PMID: 7848793 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A rational approach to the stool ova and parasite examination.Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Apr 1;42(7):972-8. doi: 10.1086/500937. Epub 2006 Feb 27. Clin Infect Dis. 2006. PMID: 16511762
-
How many stool examinations are necessary to detect pathogenic intestinal protozoa?Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995 Jul;53(1):36-9. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1995. PMID: 7625530
-
Use of "Parasep filter fecal concentrator tubes" for the detection of intestinal parasites in stool samples under routine conditions.Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011 Jan-Mar;54(1):121-3. doi: 10.4103/0377-4929.77358. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011. PMID: 21393892
-
[Parasitic fecal analyses. Prescription, application and interpretation of results].Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris). 1993 Jun-Sep;29(4):207-12. Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris). 1993. PMID: 8239491 Review. French.
-
[Cryptosporidiosis. II. Biological diagnosis].Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1984;42(6):399-405. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1984. PMID: 6398003 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Differing Effects of Standard and Harsh Nucleic Acid Extraction Procedures on Diagnostic Helminth Real-Time PCRs Applied to Human Stool Samples.Pathogens. 2021 Feb 9;10(2):188. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020188. Pathogens. 2021. PMID: 33572338 Free PMC article.
-
Disentangling the effects of intermittent faecal shedding and imperfect test sensitivity on the microscopy-based detection of gut parasites in stool samples.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Dec 5;18(12):e0012719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012719. eCollection 2024 Dec. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024. PMID: 39637237 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of a novel kit (TF-Test) for the diagnosis of intestinal parasitic infections.J Clin Lab Anal. 2004;18(2):132-8. doi: 10.1002/jcla.20011. J Clin Lab Anal. 2004. PMID: 15065214 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and associated risk factors of human intestinal parasitic infections: a population-based study in the southeast of Kerman province, southeastern Iran.BMC Infect Dis. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4730-8. BMC Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 31906872 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of pathogenic protozoa in the diagnostic laboratory: result reproducibility, specimen pooling, and competency assessment.J Clin Microbiol. 2008 Jul;46(7):2200-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01666-07. Epub 2008 Apr 30. J Clin Microbiol. 2008. PMID: 18448690 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical