Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review
- PMID: 8336883
Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review
Abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy of external cephalic version, including safety, cost-benefit analysis, and impact on the cesarean delivery rate.
Data sources: A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify all articles published in English between 1980-1991 on external cephalic version. References were also cross-checked for all reports.
Methods of study selection: We reviewed only those articles providing sufficiently detailed data to determine actual numbers of subjects. In cases of duplicate results, only the latest publication was used. Rates of successful version, cesarean delivery, and fetal and maternal complications were presented.
Data extraction and synthesis: Among the United States trials, the success rate was approximately 65% (range 48-77%), and once version succeeded, almost all the fetuses stayed in the vertex position until birth. Among those in whom external version was performed, the mean cesarean delivery rate was 37%, compared with 83% in controls (P < .001). External version would also save 12.3% of the costs of delivering breech patients overall.
Conclusion: External cephalic version is safe and cost-effective. It substantially reduces the cesarean delivery rate among breech presentations, decreases the risk related to breech delivery, and avoids cesarean delivery in subsequent pregnancies. However, external version will not have a major impact on the high overall cesarean birth rate.
Similar articles
-
[External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate].Minerva Ginecol. 2003 Dec;55(6):519-24. Minerva Ginecol. 2003. PMID: 14676741 Italian.
-
[External version in the breech presentation: a review of the literature and our experience].Minerva Ginecol. 1995 Jan-Feb;47(1-2):9-15. Minerva Ginecol. 1995. PMID: 7770152 Review. Italian.
-
Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Feb;142(2):111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Nov 18. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009. PMID: 19019528
-
External cephalic version in singleton pregnancies at term: a retrospective analysis.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66(1):18-21. doi: 10.1159/000114251. Epub 2008 Jan 30. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008. PMID: 18230911
-
Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;85(6):930-6. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00044-R. Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 7770262 Review.
Cited by
-
External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 1;2015(4):CD000083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25828903 Free PMC article.
-
Reviving external cephalic version: a review of its efficacy, safety, and technical aspects.Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019 Nov;62(6):371-381. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2019.62.6.371. Epub 2019 Oct 8. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31777732 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A decision analytical cost analysis of offering ECV in a UK district general hospital.BMC Health Serv Res. 2001;1:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-1-6. Epub 2001 Jul 4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2001. PMID: 11472641 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 9;2015(2):CD000184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000184.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 25674710 Free PMC article.
-
External cephalic version. Does it have a role in modern obstetric practice?Can Fam Physician. 1996 Apr;42:693-8. Can Fam Physician. 1996. PMID: 8653037 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials