Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Jun;231(6):318-22.
doi: 10.1007/BF00919027.

Panretinal photocoagulation in diabetic retinopathy: argon versus dye laser coagulation

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Panretinal photocoagulation in diabetic retinopathy: argon versus dye laser coagulation

V Seiberth et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1993 Jun.

Abstract

The range of wavelengths used in ophthalmic photocoagulation treatment has been greatly enlarged by the development of the dye laser. To investigate the efficacy and possible side effects of orange dye laser light in the treatment of diabetic retinopathy, we performed a prospective, controlled clinical study comparing argon blue-green and orange dye laser light. In 14 patients with diabetic retinopathy of equal severity in both eyes one eye was randomly assigned to either blue-green argon (488 and 514.5 nm) or orange dye (600 nm) panretinal laser treatment. The total coagulated area was the same in both eyes. Subjective parameters (visual acuity, perimetry, color vision) as well as objective functions (electroretinography, electro-oculography) and the clinical course were studied preoperatively and then postoperatively over a period of 6 months. Dye laser coagulation proved as effective and safe as blue-green argon laser coagulation in the panretinal treatment of diabetic retinopathy. No significant differences in postoperative retinal function were detected. However, orange laser coagulation proved significantly more painful than blue-green argon laser treatment (P = 0.002).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ophthalmology. 1978 Jan;85(1):82-106 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976 Apr;81(4):383-96 - PubMed
    1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969 Aug;68(2):263-73 - PubMed
    1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1989;227(4):364-8 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec;103(12):1796-806 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources