Corpus callosum morphometry and dichotic listening performance: individual differences in functional interhemispheric inhibition?
- PMID: 8341413
- DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(93)90051-z
Corpus callosum morphometry and dichotic listening performance: individual differences in functional interhemispheric inhibition?
Abstract
We examined the relationship between midsagittal corpus callosum area, as seen by magnetic resonance imaging, and behavioral laterality effects from a dichotic listening task requiring cross-callosal relay of an auditory signal, in 60 healthy young adults. Four patients with complete forebrain commissurotomy were also given the dichotic listening task, confirming that in this task, the report of left ear items is dependent on callosal pathways. Contrary to our predictions, callosum measures were unrelated to either a laterality measure or to inferior (typically left) ear performance. Surprisingly, superior (typically right) ear accuracies, which do not depend on cross-callosal sensory transfer, were significantly and negatively correlated with callosum size. These findings show that normal variations in callosum size do not appear to contribute significantly to individual differences in hemispheric specialization. Callosum size may, instead, be associated with degree of functional interhemispheric inhibition.
Similar articles
-
Corpus callosum size correlates with asymmetric performance on a dichotic listening task in healthy aging but not in Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(2):208-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.002. Epub 2005 Jun 13. Neuropsychologia. 2006. PMID: 15955540 Clinical Trial.
-
Anatomical-behavioral relationships: corpus callosum morphometry and hemispheric specialization.Behav Brain Res. 1994 Oct 20;64(1-2):185-202. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(94)90131-7. Behav Brain Res. 1994. PMID: 7840886
-
Functional significance of individual variations in callosal area.Neuropsychologia. 1995 Jun;33(6):769-79. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(95)00018-x. Neuropsychologia. 1995. PMID: 7675166 Clinical Trial.
-
Dichotic listening and interhemispheric integration after callosotomy: A systematic review.Brain Res. 2024 Aug 15;1837:148965. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.148965. Epub 2024 Apr 25. Brain Res. 2024. PMID: 38677451
-
The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: a review of clinical and experimental evidence.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008 Jul;32(5):1044-54. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.04.005. Epub 2008 Apr 26. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008. PMID: 18499255 Review.
Cited by
-
Reduced lateralization of the language network in the blind and its relationship with white matter tract neuroanatomy.Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Aug 12;18:1407557. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1407557. eCollection 2024. Front Hum Neurosci. 2024. PMID: 39188408 Free PMC article.
-
Dichotic listening deficits in amblyaudia are characterized by aberrant neural oscillations in auditory cortex.Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Sep;132(9):2152-2162. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2021.04.022. Epub 2021 Jun 4. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021. PMID: 34284251 Free PMC article.
-
Corpus callosum differences associated with persistent stuttering in adults.J Commun Disord. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):470-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.03.001. Epub 2011 Mar 29. J Commun Disord. 2011. PMID: 21513943 Free PMC article.
-
Right Ear Advantage of Speech Audiometry in Single-sided Deafness.Otol Neurotol. 2018 Apr;39(4):417-421. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001756. Otol Neurotol. 2018. PMID: 29533329 Free PMC article.
-
Structural and functional reorganization of the corpus callosum between the age of 6 and 8 years.Cereb Cortex. 2011 May;21(5):1012-7. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhq165. Epub 2010 Sep 16. Cereb Cortex. 2011. PMID: 20847151 Free PMC article.