Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State
- PMID: 8342718
- PMCID: PMC1695162
- DOI: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1109
Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State
Abstract
Objectives: This study examined hospital characteristics and hospital population risk factors and their associations with hospital-specific cesarean section rates in Washington State.
Methods: Data were obtained from 1987 birth certificates. The study population included all hospitals that had 12 or more singleton live births.
Results: Hospital-specific cesarean section rates varied from 0% to 43% and were positively associated with proprietary ownership, size of delivery service, and the proportions of women who had complications or high-birthweight infants. The proportion of women who had late prenatal care was inversely associated with cesarean section rates. Although proprietary hospitals had higher cesarean section rates, their patient populations were lower risk than patients of public or teaching hospitals.
Conclusions: Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals cannot be fully explained by either hospital or patient population characteristics. A combined strategy may be necessary to lower unjustifiably high cesarean section rates.
Similar articles
-
Effect of severity of illness on cesarean delivery rates in Washington State.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):474.e1-474.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.06.020. Epub 2017 Jun 27. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28666693
-
The relationship between cesarean section and labor induction.J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Jun;42(2):130-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01346.x. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010. PMID: 20618597
-
Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):123.e1-123.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.027. Epub 2015 Aug 17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 26292046
-
The relationship between cesarean delivery and gestational age among US singleton births.Clin Perinatol. 2008 Jun;35(2):309-23, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2008.03.002. Clin Perinatol. 2008. PMID: 18456071 Review.
-
[Impact of organizational factors on the cesarean delivery occurrence in a low-risk population].Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Nov;46(10-11):706-712. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 11. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018. PMID: 30318361 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 3;9(3):e025356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025356. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30833323 Free PMC article.
-
Adoption of diagnostic technology and variation in caesarean section rates: a test of the practice style hypothesis in Norway.Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2169-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01419.x. Epub 2012 May 17. Health Serv Res. 2012. PMID: 22594486 Free PMC article.
-
Interspecialty differences in the obstetric care of low-risk women.Am J Public Health. 1997 Mar;87(3):344-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.87.3.344. Am J Public Health. 1997. PMID: 9096532 Free PMC article.
-
Inter-hospital variations in caesarean sections. A risk adjusted comparison in the Valencia public hospitals.J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Aug;54(8):631-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.8.631. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000. PMID: 10890876 Free PMC article.
-
Mind the information gap: fertility rate and use of cesarean delivery and tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan.Health Econ Rev. 2011 Dec 12;1(1):20. doi: 10.1186/2191-1991-1-20. Health Econ Rev. 2011. PMID: 22828182 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical