Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 Aug;83(8):1109-12.
doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.8.1109.

Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State

Affiliations

Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals in Washington State

L McKenzie et al. Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined hospital characteristics and hospital population risk factors and their associations with hospital-specific cesarean section rates in Washington State.

Methods: Data were obtained from 1987 birth certificates. The study population included all hospitals that had 12 or more singleton live births.

Results: Hospital-specific cesarean section rates varied from 0% to 43% and were positively associated with proprietary ownership, size of delivery service, and the proportions of women who had complications or high-birthweight infants. The proportion of women who had late prenatal care was inversely associated with cesarean section rates. Although proprietary hospitals had higher cesarean section rates, their patient populations were lower risk than patients of public or teaching hospitals.

Conclusions: Variation in cesarean section rates among hospitals cannot be fully explained by either hospital or patient population characteristics. A combined strategy may be necessary to lower unjustifiably high cesarean section rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Reprod Med. 1989 Jun;34(6):407-11 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1989 Mar 16;320(11):706-9 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1989 Nov 9;321(19):1306-11 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 1990 Feb 2;263(5):683-7 - PubMed
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jan;75(1):133-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources