Family planning: cultural and religious perspectives
- PMID: 8345093
- DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138176
Family planning: cultural and religious perspectives
Abstract
The world population explosion has caused political leaders to look upon national and regional birth control projects as vital. Support for regulation of individual fertility has been evident in all cultures, and at all times, even in those societies in which social and religious rules have favoured the abundant production of children. As the secularization of Western society and scientific enquiry gained momentum during the modern period, knowledge of reproduction increased and was applied to control human population growth. The various methods of contraception and their development through the years from the ancient ideas to the modern era are presented. Each approach to fertility control has its advantages and disadvantages. No one method is perfect for everyone, for every clinical setting, and in every culture. Higher levels of fertility have been associated with 'traditional', religious prohibitions on some forms of birth control, 'traditional' values about the importance of children and the priority of family, and 'traditional' family and gender roles reinforced by religion. The attitude of the main religious groups to contraceptive practice is discussed.
PIP: Discussion of cultural and religious perspectives on family planning was traced from ancient times to the present. The roles of the main religious groups: Jewish, Roman Catholic, Prostestant, Islamic, Hindu, and Buddhist and the roles today of religion were covered. Traditional methods are indicated for females, males, and both, with additional focus on those methods most used today. There has always been support for regulation of individual fertility regardless of whether the religious rules favored many children. In ancient times, population growth was slow due to poor harvest, famine, war, poor nutrition, epidemics; and natural causes. Modern preventive medicines and modernization have had a positive effect on population growth. The current growth rate is .7% or 170 persons/minute. Since the world fertility surveys of the 1970s, there has been strong support for fertility control in almost all societies, but a gap still exists between desire and practice. In ancient times, withdrawal or anti conception rites were used; there was also evidence of quasi-scientific techniques such as female seed pod condoms or root tampons. The Greeks articulated and wrote about population control, including methods; abortion and infanticide were accepted. Both Aristotle and the ancient Egyptians recommended covering the cervix and vagina with Cedar oil. In the Medieval period, Arabic sources suggested prolonged nursing as an anti conception technique. During this period, St. Augustine promulgated for Christians the notion that contraception was sinful; abortion and homicide were equated. In the early modern period, the condom gained popularity, particularly for disease prevention. Knowledge of reproductive physiology advanced the possibilities for contraception. The occlusive pessary, which was based on ancient Egyptian devices, was developed and is still used today as the cervical cap. Experimentation was conducted with cervical rings at the turn of the century; oral contraceptive empirical research was conducted during the 1930s, but was not applied for another 30 years. There has been a convergence in birth patterns in modern times for the main religions in low fertility countries, but there have been differences in form of contraception used. Religious expression and values continue to influence the family, but education is an important means of achieving effective contraceptive use.
Similar articles
-
Contraception: traditional and religious attitudes.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993 Apr;49(1-2):15-8. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(93)90102-i. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1993. PMID: 8365507
-
Contraception in the prepill era.Contraception. 1999 Jan;59(1 Suppl):7S-10S. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(98)00130-9. Contraception. 1999. PMID: 10342089
-
Status of fertility control in Egypt.Popul Sci. 1982;(3):29-33. Popul Sci. 1982. PMID: 12266215
-
Contraceptive delivery in the developing world.Br Med Bull. 1993 Jan;49(1):27-39. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072604. Br Med Bull. 1993. PMID: 8324614 Review.
-
Barrier contraception: a comprehensive overview.Fertil Steril. 1981 Jul;36(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)45609-8. Fertil Steril. 1981. PMID: 7018929 Review.
Cited by
-
Barriers and Facilitators of Family Planning Use in Fishing Communities of Lake Victoria in Uganda.J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720943775. doi: 10.1177/2150132720943775. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020. PMID: 32698653 Free PMC article.
-
Uptake of long acting reversible contraception following integrated couples HIV and fertility goal-based family planning counselling in Catholic and non-Catholic, urban and rural government health centers in Kigali, Rwanda.Reprod Health. 2020 Aug 17;17(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12978-020-00981-0. Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 32807177 Free PMC article.
-
"They will say you want to make their home die": A mixed methods study to assess modern family planning use in partnered South Sudanese refugee and host populations in Northern Uganda.PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;2(6):e0000348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000348. eCollection 2022. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36962421 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Modern Family Planning Methods in Fishing Communities of Lake Victoria, Uganda.PLoS One. 2015 Oct 29;10(10):e0141531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141531. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26512727 Free PMC article.
-
The Influence of Religion and Ethnicity on Family Planning Approval: A Case for Women in Rural Western Kenya.J Relig Health. 2016 Feb;55(1):192-205. doi: 10.1007/s10943-015-0030-9. J Relig Health. 2016. PMID: 25763505
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous