Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993;25(2):127-39.
doi: 10.1007/BF00662138.

Predicting recurrence in axillary-node negative breast cancer patients

Affiliations

Predicting recurrence in axillary-node negative breast cancer patients

D Rosner et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1993.

Abstract

This study attempted to identify the risk groups in axillary node negative breast cancer patients using validated first-generation prognostic clinical and pathologic factors. An updated 10-year follow-up in 407 such patients treated by surgery alone at Roswell Park between 1976-1987 showed a 10-year recurrence rate (RR) of 19% (95% confidence interval +/- 5%). Predictors of outcome were, in order of strength: (1) Tumor size (p = 0.0006); RR at 10 years was 2% +/- 4 for tumors < or = 0.5 cm, 6% +/- 7 for tumors 0.6-1.0 cm, 16% +/- 9 for 1.1-2 cm, 29% +/- 12 for 2.1-5 cm, and 40% +/- 31 over 5 cm; (2) Histologic differentiation (p = 0.017); poorly differentiated/anaplastic (P/A) tumors had a greater RR (24% +/- 8) than well or moderately differentiated (W/M) tumors (13% +/- 8); (3) Age (p = 0.046); patients < 35 showed a RR of 28% +/- 20, pts 35-50, 22% +/- 10, and pts > 50,17% +/- 7 (p = 0.046). Cox Model analysis showed tumor size (4 groups) significant at < 0.0001, histologic differentiation (2 groups) significant at < 0.0005 after allowing for size, and age (+/- 50) significant at < 0.05 after allowing for size and differentiation. Combining these variables into subgroups enables selecting groups at various risks of recurrence. Groups with low risk are: (1) patients with tumor < or = 1 cm, W/M (0% RR), (2) patients with ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (0% RR), and (3) patients with tumors < or = 1 cm, P/A (8% RR). In a suggestive finding in this last group, those over age 50 achieved a RR of 3% +/- 6, while those age 50 or less had RR 14% +/- 15. With the exception of this last group, all should be considered highly curable using loco-regional therapy alone, and might be spared the risks and costs of routine systemic adjuvant therapy. Groups with high risk are: (1) patients with tumors > 2 cm (RR 32% +/- 12), and (2) patients with tumors 1.1-2 cm, P/A (RR 21% +/- 14). These should receive adjuvant therapy. Groups with intermediate risk are patients with tumor 1.1-2 cm, W/M (RR 12% +/- 12). In a suggestive finding, those in this group over age 50 had a RR of 11% +/- 12, while those up to 50 had a RR of 17% +/- 30. These patients should be considered to be prime candidates for clinical trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer. 1990 Jul 15;66(2):199-205 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1980 Nov 1;281(6249):1179-80 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1990 May 1;50(9):2741-6 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1989 Mar;7(3):355-66 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1986 May;4(5):678-84 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources