Clinical significance of dysplasia in gastric remnant biopsy specimens
- PMID: 8348487
- DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930901)72:5<1532::aid-cncr2820720507>3.0.co;2-8
Clinical significance of dysplasia in gastric remnant biopsy specimens
Abstract
Background: Dysplasia often is found in biopsy specimens from the gastric stump some 20 years after ulcer surgery. A high frequency of patients with severe dysplasia in the nonoperated stomach develop carcinoma but the clinical significance of dysplasia in the gastric stump is still confounding.
Methods: In the current study, two groups of patients were evaluated. One group of 22 patients, found at the first investigation in an endoscopic screening study with moderate dysplasia in the gastric stump, were regularly followed up to 18 years with endoscopy and biopsies. In the second part of the investigation, the authors evaluated 17 patients from the same endoscopic screening study, who at any instance during the 18 years were found to have severe dysplasia in biopsy specimens from the gastric remnant.
Results: In three of the 22 patients with moderate dysplasia, stump carcinoma was diagnosed 2, 2, and 6 years, respectively, after the first endoscopic examination. Severe dysplasia was found in two other patients at one occasion but later investigations only revealed moderate dysplasia. The remainder of the patients in this group had either persisting moderate dysplasia or mild dysplasia at follow-up. Seven (41%) of the 17 patients with severe dysplasia had stump carcinoma within a median time of 2 years (range, 1-11). Two other patients had surgery based on suspicion of carcinoma, but had only severe dysplasia in the surgical specimen. Finally, three men died (after 1, 2, and 17 years, respectively) of unrelated disease without suspicion of stump carcinoma and five patients were followed between 6 and 18 years without signs of malignant development.
Conclusions: Patients with moderate and, especially, severe dysplasia in the gastric remnant are at high risk for gastric carcinoma. Severe dysplasia calls for endoscopic surveillance at short intervals. For patients with moderate dysplasia a close surveillance for 2 years followed by biannual evaluation appears sufficient.
Similar articles
-
Gastric stump mucosa: is there a risk for carcinoma?Arq Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct-Dec;38(4):227-31. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032001000400004. Arq Gastroenterol. 2001. PMID: 12068532
-
Endoscopic screening for malignancy in the gastric remnant: the clinical significance of dysplasia in gastric mucosa.J Clin Pathol. 1984 Jul;37(7):748-54. doi: 10.1136/jcp.37.7.748. J Clin Pathol. 1984. PMID: 6747012 Free PMC article.
-
Endoscopic review of patients who have had gastric surgery.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Mar 5;286(6367):755-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6367.755. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983. PMID: 6402234 Free PMC article.
-
[Clinical pathology of gastric mucosal dysplasia].Orv Hetil. 1992 Aug 30;133(35):2227-32. Orv Hetil. 1992. PMID: 1528586 Review. Hungarian.
-
[Usefulness of long-term endoscopic follow-up of gastric ulcer. Study of related epithelial dysplasia].Chir Ital. 1989 Feb;41(1):10-21. Chir Ital. 1989. PMID: 2695261 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Is there a dysplasia-carcinoma sequence in rat gastric remnant?Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Mar;42(3):608-15. doi: 10.1023/a:1018815613848. Dig Dis Sci. 1997. PMID: 9073147
-
Gastric pouch adenocarcinoma and tubular adenoma of the pylorus: a field effect of dysplasia following bariatric surgery.Obes Surg. 2007 Jun;17(6):843-6. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9130-2. Obes Surg. 2007. PMID: 17879590
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical