Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1993 May;27(5):868-73.
doi: 10.1093/cvr/27.5.868.

Estimation of left ventricular elastance without altering preload or afterload in the conscious dog

Affiliations

Estimation of left ventricular elastance without altering preload or afterload in the conscious dog

T Nakamoto et al. Cardiovasc Res. 1993 May.

Abstract

Objective: The aim was to determine the slope (EES) of the left ventricular end systolic pressure-volume line (ESPVL) without altering preload or afterload in conscious dogs.

Methods: Dogs (n = 10) were instrumented to determine left ventricular volume from ultrasonic left ventricular internal dimensions, and to measure left ventricular pressure using a micromanometer. Studies were performed one to two weeks after instrumentation while the animals were conscious. ESPVL was determined from variably loaded left ventricular pressure-volume (P-V) loops generated by the vena caval occlusion. Contractile state was increased by intravenous dobutamine (8 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1) and decreased by intravenous verapamil (10 mg) given after autonomic blockade. From a single normally ejecting beat, we calculated EES-single beat (mm Hg.ml-1) as peak isovolumetric pressure (Pmax) minus end systolic pressure divided by stroke volume. Sunagawa's technique was used to estimate Pmax by fitting the pressure during the isovolumetric contraction and relaxation as: P(t) = 1/2 X Piso[1-cos(omega t+c)]+LVEDP, where Piso = peak isovolumetric developed pressure, LVEDP = left ventricular end diastolic pressure, c = constant accounting for variations in phase angle, and omega = 2 pi/T in which T is duration of contraction.

Results: After dobutamine, EES increased, from 8.9(SEM 0.8) to 12.5(1.0) mm Hg.ml-1 (p < 0.05), and EES-single beat increased from 9.1(0.9) to 12.0(1.4) mm Hg.ml-1 (p < 0.05). Conversely, after verapamil, EES decreased, from 11.1(1.2) to 6.3(1.1) mm Hg.ml-1, (p < 0.05), and EES-single beat also decreased, from 9.6(1.0) to 7.3(1.2) mm Hg.ml-1, (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: EES calculated from one beat is similar to EES determined from variably loaded left ventricular loops and responds appropriately to inotropic stimulation. This technique provides a reasonable method to calculate EES from left ventricular pressure and stroke volume without altering preload or afterload.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources