Confirmation of positive results for chlamydial antigen by the Chlamydiazyme assay: value of repeated testing and a blocking antibody assay
- PMID: 8349769
- PMCID: PMC265652
- DOI: 10.1128/jcm.31.7.1892-1895.1993
Confirmation of positive results for chlamydial antigen by the Chlamydiazyme assay: value of repeated testing and a blocking antibody assay
Abstract
We studied the specificity of the Abbott Chlamydiazyme test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by means of a specific blocking antibody test. A total of 457 previously positive specimens were tested; 22 did not block in the blocking antibody test, 39 did not repeat as positive, and 396 were confirmed as positive. The distribution of A492 values obtained with specimens which did not repeat as positive was nonrandom and was concentrated between the cutoff values and 0.400. The positive predictive value of the Chlamydiazyme assay after initial testing was 86.7% (396 of 457), but the positive predictive value increased to 94.7% (396 of 418) if specimens which were not repeatedly positive were considered negative. We recommend routinely repeating the Chlamydiazyme assay for all specimens which give A492 values between the cutoff and 0.400 to eliminate many false-positive results. Use of the blocking antibody reagent can then be reserved for confirming only specimens which are repeatedly positive.
Similar articles
-
Direct fluorescent-antibody confirmation of chlamydial antigen below the detection threshold of the chlamydiazyme enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Jun;31(6):1646-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.6.1646-1647.1993. J Clin Microbiol. 1993. PMID: 8315010 Free PMC article.
-
Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type.Sex Transm Dis. 1993 Nov-Dec;20(6):301-6. Sex Transm Dis. 1993. PMID: 8108751
-
Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method.J Clin Microbiol. 1990 Jun;28(6):1108-13. doi: 10.1128/jcm.28.6.1108-1113.1990. J Clin Microbiol. 1990. PMID: 2199483 Free PMC article.
-
Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.Microbiologica. 1987 Oct;10(4):421-5. Microbiologica. 1987. PMID: 3320688
-
Diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis infections using antigen detection methods.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Mar;4(3 Suppl):93S-99S. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(86)80047-5. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986. PMID: 3084162 Review.
Cited by
-
Blocking antibody assay for confirmation of urogenital Chlamydia infection.Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995 Sep;2(5):634-5. doi: 10.1128/cdli.2.5.634-635.1995. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995. PMID: 8548547 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen by enzyme immunoassay: importance of confirmatory testing.J Clin Pathol. 1995 Mar;48(3):214-7. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.3.214. J Clin Pathol. 1995. PMID: 7730479 Free PMC article.
-
PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining confirm Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in swabs and urine below the detection threshold of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay.J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Nov;33(11):2847-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.11.2847-2849.1995. J Clin Microbiol. 1995. PMID: 8576331 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources