Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1993 Sep;82(3):365-70.

Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume

Affiliations
  • PMID: 8355935
Review

Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume

C A Combs et al. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To derive a formula for sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) based on a two-compartment model of fetal volume and to test it against two widely used formulas, especially at the extremes of fetal weight for which existing formulas are generally inaccurate.

Methods: We analyzed 865 consecutive sonograms that met the following inclusion criteria: singleton pregnancy, normal anatomy, delivery within 3 days of sonography, and measurements of biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL). The weight of the fetal head was modeled to be proportional to HC3, and the weight of the trunk proportional to AC2 x FL. The proportionality constants were found by multiple linear regression on 380 sonograms performed in 1990 (the "derivation set"). The new formula was tested for accuracy of prediction of actual birth weight against the formulas of Hadlock et al and Shepard et al using 485 sonograms from 1991-1992 (the "validation set").

Results: In the derivation set, the formula EFW = (0.23718 x AC2 x FL) + (0.03312 x HC3) was fit; the correlation with actual birth weight had an r value of 0.996. In the validation set, the new formula produced smaller systematic errors and smaller absolute errors than either the Hadlock or Shepard formula both overall and in fetal weight strata from less than 1000 g to over 4000 g.

Conclusion: The new formula makes geometric sense and provides accurate estimates of fetal weight across a broad range of weights.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources