Position statement on interphase in situ hybridization prenatal diagnosis. Report of the Southeastern Regional Genetics Group (SERGG)

Guideline

H A Lubs et al. Am J Med Genet. 1993.

. 1993 Jun 1;46(4):478.

doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320460431.

No abstract available

Similar articles

Development and clinical studies of in situ hybridization techniques in prenatal diagnosis.
Bryndorf T. Bryndorf T. Dan Med Bull. 1998 Jun;45(3):298-312. Dan Med Bull. 1998. PMID: 9675541 Review. No abstract available.
American College of Medical Genetics. Prenatal interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) policy statement.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Aug;53(2):526-7. Am J Hum Genet. 1993. PMID: 8328463 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Two more possible pitfalls of rapid prenatal diagnostics using interphase nuclei.
Liehr T, Schreyer I, Neumann A, Beensen V, Ziegler M, Hartmann I, Starke H, Heller A, Nietzel A, Claussen U. Liehr T, et al. Prenat Diagn. 2002 Jun;22(6):497-9. doi: 10.1002/pd.299. Prenat Diagn. 2002. PMID: 12116314 No abstract available.
Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2-year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature.
Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao PN, Lese CM, Rita D, Wyandt H, Gersen S, White B, Schoonmaker MM. Tepperberg J, et al. Prenat Diagn. 2001 Apr;21(4):293-301. doi: 10.1002/pd.57. Prenat Diagn. 2001. PMID: 11288120 Review.
Interphase FISH with chromosome-specific protelomere probes for rapid prenatal diagnosis in a reciprocal translocation carrier.
Cotter PD, Musci TJ. Cotter PD, et al. Prenat Diagn. 2001 Mar;21(3):171-5. Prenat Diagn. 2001. PMID: 11260602

Cytogenetic analysis in prenatal diagnosis.
Schonberg SA. Schonberg SA. West J Med. 1993 Sep;159(3):360-5. West J Med. 1993. PMID: 8236978 Free PMC article. Review.