Models of source currents in the brain
- PMID: 8357703
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01128686
Models of source currents in the brain
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) provide signals that are weighted integrals of source currents in the brain. In addition to technical aspects, the two methods differ in their sensitivities to various cerebral sources. Moreover, it is more difficult to determine the lead fields of EEG than of MEG. If it can be assumed that only one localized source is active at a particular time, the source location, direction, and amplitude can be found with the dipole model. However, if the assumption of a single localized source is violated, erroneous results are obtained. If a few sources are responsible for the measured fields, multiple-dipole models can be used. In the general case one must start from the fundamentals of estimation theory. The use of a priori information, together with experimental data, will provide the best possible solution to the inverse problem. In the case of minimal prior information, the so-called minimum-norm solution is obtained. With the help of supplementary information, the resolution can be further improved.
Similar articles
-
Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999 May;46(5):522-34. doi: 10.1109/10.759053. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999. PMID: 10230131
-
Minimum-norm cortical source estimation in layered head models is robust against skull conductivity error.Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 1;81:265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.086. Epub 2013 Apr 29. Neuroimage. 2013. PMID: 23639259 Free PMC article.
-
Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:328-42. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.040. Epub 2014 Dec 23. Neuroimage. 2015. PMID: 25541187
-
Dipole theory and electroencephalography.Clin Electroencephalogr. 1996 Jul;27(3):121-31. doi: 10.1177/155005949602700305. Clin Electroencephalogr. 1996. PMID: 8828975 Review.
-
Fundamentals of electroencefalography, magnetoencefalography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging.Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009;86:67-80. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(09)86005-4. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009. PMID: 19607991 Review.
Cited by
-
Empirical Comparison of Distributed Source Localization Methods for Single-Trial Detection of Movement Preparation.Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Sep 3;12:340. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00340. eCollection 2018. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30233341 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic ultrarapid activation and inhibition of cortical motor systems in spoken word comprehension.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 May 6;111(18):E1918-23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323158111. Epub 2014 Apr 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014. PMID: 24753617 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of attention on what is known and what is not: MEG evidence for functionally discrete memory circuits.Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Jun 30;3:10. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.010.2009. eCollection 2009. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 19680433 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid cortical plasticity underlying novel word learning.J Neurosci. 2010 Dec 15;30(50):16864-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1376-10.2010. J Neurosci. 2010. PMID: 21159957 Free PMC article.
-
Attention to language: novel MEG paradigm for registering involuntary language processing in the brain.Neuropsychologia. 2012 Sep;50(11):2605-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.012. Epub 2012 Jul 20. Neuropsychologia. 2012. PMID: 22820635 Free PMC article.