A preliminary investigation of opinions and behaviors regarding advance directives for medical care
- PMID: 8358465
A preliminary investigation of opinions and behaviors regarding advance directives for medical care
Abstract
Background: Advance directives are a means of promoting patient autonomy in end-of-life decisions but are used infrequently. A recent federal law requires healthcare organizations to provide information to patients about advance directives. This study explored attitudes and behaviors related to the use of advance directives in three areas: familiarity with advance directives, reasons for completing or not completing advance directives and preferences for receiving information about advance directives.
Methods: A questionnaire was administered by personal interview to a nonrandomized convenience sample of 46 inpatients and 50 outpatients at a large, tertiary care, urban academic medical center in the summer of 1991.
Results: Most respondents (77%) had heard of either the living will or durable power of attorney for healthcare, but only 52% correctly understood the purpose of these documents. Twenty-nine percent of the sample had executed an advance directive. Those who had advance directives were older and considered themselves less healthy than did those without advance directives. Unfamiliarity with advance directives and procrastination were cited most often as reasons for not having an advance directive. Most subjects (65%) had spoken with someone, usually a family member or close friend, about preferences for treatment during a critical illness. Although they had rarely discussed advance directives, 83% anticipated that they would be comfortable doing so with a physician or a nurse.
Conclusions: Advance directives are used infrequently to document treatment preferences. The success of programs to promote greater use of advance directives depends on a clearer understanding of the factors that influence both decision and action to execute an advance directive. Patients claim to be comfortable in discussing the topic and prefer that such discussions occur in the outpatient setting.
Similar articles
-
Canadian outpatients and advance directives: poor knowledge and little experience but positive attitudes.CMAJ. 1993 May 1;148(9):1497-502. CMAJ. 1993. PMID: 8477368 Free PMC article.
-
Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians' attitudes, their inpatients' wishes, and reported experience.Arch Intern Med. 1994 Oct 24;154(20):2299-308. Arch Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 7944852
-
Relationship of advance directives to physician-patient communication.Arch Intern Med. 1994 Apr 25;154(8):909-13. Arch Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 8154954
-
Advance directives: barriers to completion.J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 1998 Mar;29(1):4-8. J N Y State Nurses Assoc. 1998. PMID: 9923243 Review.
-
Advance end-of-life treatment planning. A research review.Arch Intern Med. 1996 May 27;156(10):1062-8. Arch Intern Med. 1996. PMID: 8638992 Review.
Cited by
-
A multimedia intervention on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and advance directives.J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Sep;14(9):559-63. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.11208.x. J Gen Intern Med. 1999. PMID: 10491246 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Advance directives and do-not-resuscitate orders in patients with cancer with metastatic spinal cord compression: advanced care planning implications.J Palliat Med. 2010 May;13(5):513-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0376. J Palliat Med. 2010. PMID: 20192843 Free PMC article.
-
Older Adults Making End of Life Decisions: An Application of Roy's Adaptation Model.J Aging Res. 2013;2013:470812. doi: 10.1155/2013/470812. Epub 2013 Dec 26. J Aging Res. 2013. PMID: 24455259 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Medical