Anticoagulants, antiaggregants or nothing following carotid endarterectomy?

Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy (TEA) has proven to be beneficial for symptomatic patients. Anticoagulation (AC) and antiplatelet therapy (ASA) have been shown to prolong life following vascular surgery in patients with occlusive arterial disease (PAOD). To determine whether ASA or AC prolong life after TEA, retrospective analysis was undertaken, since cerebral haemorrhage is associated with the use of both drugs, especially AC. Between 1979-1986, 328 patients with stenotic lesions of the carotid bifurcation were operated upon electively. Patient survival and causes of death were the primary end points of the analysis. Recent data were obtained from the Austrian Central Bureau of Statistics. Cumulative survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier estimation and differences determined by Breslow and Mantel tests. 36 patients were on AC, 157 on ASA and 135 remained without medication (0-group). Since the common risk factors in PAOD were unevenly distributed between groups, a stepwise Cox regression model was applied which revealed age (p < 0.01), cardiac pathology (p < 0.01) and diabetes (p < 0.05) as relevant for survival. Therefore, ASA patients and 0-group patients were selected and matched, employing the aforementioned prognostic criteria, and compared to the patients on long-term AC for various indications (vein bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism; i.e. data-matching). The median postoperative survival was 7.72 years for ASA and 8.48 years for AC, compared to 6.07 years for the 0-group (p = 0.0095 Breslow, p = 0.477 Mantel). There was no significant difference between AC and ASA treated patients. Irrespective of medication, the causes of death were well balanced, and no higher incidence of intracerebral haemorrhage was detected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)