Ascertainment corrected rates: applications of capture-recapture methods
- PMID: 8359975
- DOI: 10.1093/ije/22.3.559
Ascertainment corrected rates: applications of capture-recapture methods
Abstract
Accurate rates, though fundamental to epidemiology, are often very difficult to obtain. Incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates have traditionally been established through either passive reporting surveillance systems, through active surveillance systems, or by a combination of the two methods. Typically, when researchers employ these approaches they do not formally evaluate or correct for the degree of underascertainment. Undercount of cases is a potent determinant of rates which we cannot continue to ignore. We believe all rates should be adjusted for underascertainment in order to achieve a truer picture of the risk and risk factors of disease. Here, we present a procedure to ascertainment correct rates based upon well established capture-recapture methods.
Comment in
-
Limitations to the universal use of capture-recapture methods.Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Dec;23(6):1322-3. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.6.1322. Int J Epidemiol. 1994. PMID: 7721537 No abstract available.
-
Ascertainment corrected rates: applications of capture-recapture methods.Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Aug;23(4):865-6. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.4.865. Int J Epidemiol. 1994. PMID: 8002204 No abstract available.
-
Ascertainment corrected rates.Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;23(1):203-4. doi: 10.1093/ije/23.1.203. Int J Epidemiol. 1994. PMID: 8194919 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources