Randomized comparison of oral fluconazole versus oral polyenes for the prevention of fungal infection in patients at risk of neutropenia. Multicentre Study Group
- PMID: 8360134
- DOI: 10.1093/jac/31.6.973
Randomized comparison of oral fluconazole versus oral polyenes for the prevention of fungal infection in patients at risk of neutropenia. Multicentre Study Group
Abstract
An open, randomized study was performed at 18 European centres to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerance of oral fluconazole with oral polyenes for the prophylaxis of fungal colonization and infection in adults at high risk of developing neutropenia. Five hundred and thirty-six hospitalized patients with malignant disease, about to receive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or bone marrow transplantation, and who were already neutropenic or were expected to develop neutropenia were included in the study. Before therapy or transplantation, patients commenced either oral fluconazole therapy (50 mg/day as a single dose) or oral polyenes therapy (amphotericin B 2 g/day and/or nystatin 4 x 10(6) units/day in four or more divided doses), for a mean of 29.3 days and 31.3 days, respectively. After baseline clinical and mycological testing, patients were re-evaluated at least weekly during prophylaxis, at the end of prophylaxis and two to six weeks later to identify proven or suspected fungal infection and to determine rates of colonization with fungi. Fungal infection was diagnosed in 41 of 511 evaluable patients, 10 (3.9%) of 256 in the fluconazole group and 31 (12.2%) of 255 in the polyene group (P = 0.001). This total included four patients (1.6%) in the fluconazole group who developed oropharyngeal candidiasis compared with 22 (8.6%) in the polyene group (P < 0.001). Systemic infections comprised 6 (2.3%) in the fluconazole group and 9 (3.5%) in the polyene group (P = not significant), and included three Candida krusei infections in each group. Parenteral amphotericin B therapy was given empirically for persistent fevers in an additional 62 (24.2%) patients receiving fluconazole and 59 (23.1%) receiving polyenes (P = not significant). Colonization with fungi was generally similar in each treatment group, although an increased proportion of patients receiving fluconazole developed colonization of the faeces (P < 0.01). Adverse reactions, possibly related to treatment, were recorded in 15 (5.6%) of 269 patients in the fluconazole group and 14 (5.2%) of 267 in the polyene group; these necessitated discontinuation of therapy in seven patients in each group. Once-a-day fluconazole was therefore more effective than oral polyenes for the prevention of oropharyngeal fungal infection and as effective for the prevention of infections at other sites in patients with neutropenia.
Similar articles
-
A multicentre study of fluconazole versus oral polyenes in the prevention of fungal infection in children with hematological or oncological malignancies. Multicentre Study Group.Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994 Apr;13(4):330-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01974614. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1994. PMID: 7794307 Clinical Trial.
-
Itraconazole versus amphotericin B plus nystatin in the prophylaxis of fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001 Jul;48(1):97-103. doi: 10.1093/jac/48.1.97. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001. PMID: 11418517 Clinical Trial.
-
Preventing fungal infection in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia: fluconazole compared with oral amphotericin B.Ann Intern Med. 1994 Jun 1;120(11):913-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-11-199406010-00003. Ann Intern Med. 1994. PMID: 8172437 Clinical Trial.
-
[Prophylaxis against mycoses in neutropenic patients].Mycoses. 1994;37 Suppl 2:70-6. Mycoses. 1994. PMID: 7541892 Review. German.
-
Antifungal prophylaxis with itraconazole oral solution in neutropenic patients.Mycoses. 1999;42 Suppl 2:121-4. Mycoses. 1999. PMID: 10865918 Review.
Cited by
-
Fungal infections in patients with neutropenia: challenges in prophylaxis and treatment.Drugs Aging. 2000 Nov;17(5):339-51. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200017050-00002. Drugs Aging. 2000. PMID: 11190415 Review.
-
[Preventive antimycotic therapy of neutropenic and immunosuppressed patients].Med Klin (Munich). 1997 Jan 15;92(1):28-36. doi: 10.1007/BF03042279. Med Klin (Munich). 1997. PMID: 9121412 Review. German.
-
Primary Fungal Prophylaxis in Hematological Malignancy: a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jul 27;62(8):e00355-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00355-18. Print 2018 Aug. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018. PMID: 29866872 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based guidelines for empirical therapy of neutropenic fever in Korea.Korean J Intern Med. 2011 Jun;26(2):220-52. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2011.26.2.220. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Korean J Intern Med. 2011. PMID: 21716917 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Amphotericin B versus fluconazole for controlling fungal infections in neutropenic cancer patients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4;2014(9):CD000239. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000239.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25188769 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical