Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations
- PMID: 8362785
- DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81725-1
Bimaxillary protrusion in black Americans--an esthetic evaluation and the treatment considerations
Abstract
This study attempted to discover what black Americans find attractive about their profile. Fifteen black patients (eight males, seven females) were selected at random and used as models. Lateral photographs were taken on each patient, and a computer was used to alter the profiles to depict different levels of bimaxillary protrusion. Each patient was manipulated into four different profile types according to specific numerical guidelines. A vertical reference line from soft tissue glabella, perpendicular to Frankfort horizontal, was used to measure the lip position. In each profile type only the horizontal lip position was altered. The four profile types were classified as S (straight) BM1, (bimax one), BM2 (bimax two) and BM3 (bimax three). The S profile was considered a straight or white facial profile, and the BM3 was an extreme example of bimaxillary protrusion. The photographs were surveyed among black and white laypersons, general dentists, and orthodontists. The results found the BM1 profile to be the most attractive. This was consistent with all groups surveyed. The BM1 profile would be considered a slightly convex profile and is more protrusive than white orthodontic norms. In this study comparisons of this profile to other standards are made and treatment considerations for black patients are discussed.
Similar articles
-
A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jun;127(6):692-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.018. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005. PMID: 15953894
-
Esthetic evaluation of Asian-Chinese profiles from a white perspective.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):532-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.03.038. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008. PMID: 18405817
-
Facial profile esthetic preferences: perception in two Brazilian states.Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):88-95. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.088-095.oar. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015. PMID: 26154461 Free PMC article.
-
Esthetic preferences of European American, Hispanic American, Japanese, and African judges for soft-tissue profiles.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Apr;135(4 Suppl):S87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.019. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19362272
-
[Is the ethnic factor an orthodontic therapeutic instructor?].Orthod Fr. 2011 Dec;82(4):347-58. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2011143. Epub 2011 Nov 23. Orthod Fr. 2011. PMID: 22105683 Review. French.
Cited by
-
What do black patients expect from orthodontic treatment? The aesthetic perception of facial profile between orthodontists and black laypersons.Dental Press J Orthod. 2022 Sep 5;27(4):e2220519. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.27.4.e2220519.oar. eCollection 2022. Dental Press J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 36074432 Free PMC article.
-
Thresholds of Abnormality Perception in Facial Esthetics among Laypersons and Dental Professionals: Profile Esthetics.Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 8;2020:2068961. doi: 10.1155/2020/2068961. eCollection 2020. Int J Dent. 2020. PMID: 33101413 Free PMC article.
-
Frictionless Mechanics for Correction of Bimaxillary Protrusion: A Case Report.Cureus. 2024 Mar 20;16(3):e56522. doi: 10.7759/cureus.56522. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38646347 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of social media on the esthetic perception of the lip profile of orthodontic patients.Heliyon. 2023 May 10;9(5):e15870. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15870. eCollection 2023 May. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37251874 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of the facial dimensions of young adult women with a preferred facial appearance.Korean J Orthod. 2015 Sep;45(5):253-60. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.253. Epub 2015 Sep 23. Korean J Orthod. 2015. PMID: 26445720 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous