Clinical versus quantitative assessment of headgear compliance
- PMID: 8362790
- DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81731-7
Clinical versus quantitative assessment of headgear compliance
Abstract
This study was undertaken to determine if clinicians could accurately evaluate headgear compliance. Headgear timers were used covertly to quantitatively assess the headgear compliance of 28 patients over 3 consecutive months. Investigators subjectively evaluated the patients to determine how many hours per day they felt the patient had been wearing the headgear. Investigators were divided into three groups: (1) 5 orthodontists (2 board certified, 3 board eligible--total of 50 years of orthodontic experience); (2) 10 residents; and (3) 11 assistants. At least two investigators from each group evaluated the same person for all three appointments. The average error values were 2.86 hours, 3.27 hours, and 3.61 hours, respectively, for the three groups. The standard deviations were also very large, indicating that no group could accurately or consistently assess headgear wear. In this study no difference was found in compliance between sexes. Patients 10 to 12 years of age were more compliant than those 12 to 14 years of age, which were more compliant than the > 16 age group. The least compliant was the 14 to 16 year age group.
Similar articles
-
Clinical and quantitative assessment of headgear compliance: a pilot study.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Feb;129(2):239-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.035. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006. PMID: 16473716
-
The role of the headgear calendar in headgear compliance.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993 Oct;104(4):387-94. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81338-1. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993. PMID: 8213662
-
Comparing subjective and objective measures of headgear compliance.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):801-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.041. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 18068600
-
Cervical headgear vs pendulum appliance for the treatment of moderate skeletal Class II malocclusion.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Nov;132(5):616-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.043. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007. PMID: 18005835 Clinical Trial.
-
Headgear compliance as assessed by a temperature-sensitive recording device: a prospective clinical study.Eur J Orthod. 2019 Nov 15;41(6):641-645. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjz036. Eur J Orthod. 2019. PMID: 31143922
Cited by
-
Effect of Forsus-assisted mandibular advancement on the adaptation of craniocervical posture - A retrospective study.J Orthod Sci. 2024 Nov 25;13:51. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_121_23. eCollection 2024. J Orthod Sci. 2024. PMID: 39758101 Free PMC article.
-
Adherence in orthodontic settings: understanding practitioner views in a UK sample.Angle Orthod. 2015 Sep;85(5):826-32. doi: 10.2319/091014-635.1. Epub 2015 Feb 4. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 25970568 Free PMC article.
-
How patient-selected colors for removable appliances are reflected in electronically tracked compliance (wear times and wear behavior).Angle Orthod. 2018 Jul;88(4):458-464. doi: 10.2319/101617-700.1. Epub 2018 Mar 27. Angle Orthod. 2018. PMID: 29583018 Free PMC article.
-
How is adult patient adherence recorded in orthodontists' clinical notes? A mixed-method case-note study.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017 Oct 20;11:1807-1814. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S141943. eCollection 2017. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017. PMID: 29118574 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of force magnitude on dental arches in cervical headgear therapy.Eur J Orthod. 2022 Mar 30;44(2):146-154. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjab051. Eur J Orthod. 2022. PMID: 34369566 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources