[Change in radiation exposure in x-ray diagnosis today?]
- PMID: 8364051
[Change in radiation exposure in x-ray diagnosis today?]
Abstract
The dosage for the single exposure is today from a half to a quarter of the dosage used 20 years ago. The number of diagnostic X-ray examinations performed has increased; this increase concerns mainly patients whose life expectancy is shorter than the latency period to the manifestation of an X-ray induced malignoma and whose reproduction probability is very low. The genetic risk therefore is zero. This was demonstrated for coronary angiography. The dose distribution in the body shows important differences between conventional X-ray diagnostic and computed tomography. One cannot calculate the radiation risk of roentgen diagnostics from a dose applied to the population or from a dose per head of a population. Such a dose is not suitable for comparison with radiation exposure due to natural sources and civilization. The overall risk of disease is not altered by radiation exposure of an adequate roentgen diagnosis method.
Similar articles
-
[Basis of radiation protection].Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1996 Jun 29;126(26):1157-71. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1996. PMID: 8711464 Review. German.
-
Patient exposure in medical X-ray imaging in Europe.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005;114(1-3):11-25. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch538. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2005. PMID: 15933076
-
The role of digital technologies to decrease the radiation exposure from X-ray diagnostics to the population of Ukraine.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):98-9. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncq089. Epub 2010 Mar 11. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010. PMID: 20223851
-
[Ionizing radiation. Radiation sources, radiation dosage, radiation effects. II. Radiation dosage from natural sources and the civilization-induced increase in the radiation dosage from natural sources].Rontgenpraxis. 1985 Aug;38(8):275-89. Rontgenpraxis. 1985. PMID: 3904034 Review. German. No abstract available.
-
Update of diagnostic medical and dental x-ray exposures in Romania.J Radiol Prot. 2008 Dec;28(4):563-71. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/28/4/008. Epub 2008 Nov 24. J Radiol Prot. 2008. PMID: 19029586